Yugioh Card Maker Forum
Sub-Type X (53+ Supporters) - Printable Version

+- Yugioh Card Maker Forum (http://forum.yugiohcardmaker.net)
+-- Forum: Yu-Gi-Oh Card Maker (/forum-20.html)
+--- Forum: Comments & Suggestions (/forum-3.html)
+--- Thread: Sub-Type X (53+ Supporters) (/thread-130975.html)

Sub-Type X (53+ Supporters) - Corporal Atlas - 06-25-2009 12:44 PM

I just noticed an annoying thing while creating a new card. If you plan on creating a sub-type that doesn't already exist on an effect monster you get: "*type* / *new sub-type* / Effect" which cripples the overall realism in the card. I suggest that there be a new option while selecting what kind of monster card you want to make. Sub-Type X. It makes your card Orange like an effect, but the effect part isn't added. Instead, a bar below has an area to write in what you want to go in that spot instead of effect.

So, before:

[Warrior / Marshmallow / Effect]

After:

[Warrior / Marshmallow]


Just a little suggestion that'd make these cards more realistic.

Also, a little post from OMG that addresses many things people keep repeating.
(07-02-2009 08:24 PM)OMGAKITTY Wrote:  I think its a good idea. Sure, there are other ways to do it, but by that same value, there are other ways to make an entire card >_>
I could make my card entirely in photoshop, but thats a pain in the ass. Thus, I use the card maker. Same principle.

Plus, if this site were 100% about realism, it wouldn't have the Pop culture and Other subforums.

I support.

Supporters 1-50 (Click to View)
Seth001
The Than
Lazer Yoshi
Death Bishop

RE: Sub-Type X - Crow™ - 06-25-2009 12:47 PM

You have my most valued support. Sounds cool..

RE: Sub-Type X - -The Dark Master- - 06-25-2009 12:48 PM

Supported.

RE: Sub-Type X - A●O●J - 06-25-2009 01:00 PM

I support

RE: Sub-Type X - ~JG~ - 06-25-2009 01:29 PM

It's been suggested many times before, and I still support.

RE: Sub-Type X - moneypony - 06-25-2009 04:09 PM

(06-25-2009 01:29 PM)~JG~ Wrote:  It's been suggested many times before, and I still support.

And yet this one was never non-supported >_>
this proves that ideas posted by more famous members get more support

i don't support,this site was supposed to be used to create realistic cards,adding custom sub-types would be pointless,if you really want to make custom ones,just follow j-max's tut

RE: Sub-Type X - jk233_ultimatemaster - 06-25-2009 04:11 PM

I support too!

RE: Sub-Type X - Kale - 06-25-2009 07:45 PM

you know, there is a tut where you can copy the properties of the card, put it into a word document, find the part of the code where it says the subtype, then add in your own word, the place it in the url of your web browser, and when you hit enter it has that subtype without the /Effect on it.

find it...?

it should be in tuts.

RE: Sub-Type X - Corporal Atlas - 06-25-2009 07:48 PM

(06-25-2009 04:09 PM)moneypony Wrote:  
(06-25-2009 01:29 PM)~JG~ Wrote:  It's been suggested many times before, and I still support.

And yet this one was never non-supported >_>
this proves that ideas posted by more famous members get more support

i don't support,this site was supposed to be used to create realistic cards,adding custom sub-types would be pointless,if you really want to make custom ones,just follow j-max's tut

New sub-types aren't unrealistic. New ones are implemented at various points, so they're just as subjective as archetypes.

RE: Sub-Type X - moneypony - 06-25-2009 07:55 PM

(06-25-2009 07:48 PM)Corporal Atlas Wrote:  
(06-25-2009 04:09 PM)moneypony Wrote:  
(06-25-2009 01:29 PM)~JG~ Wrote:  It's been suggested many times before, and I still support.

And yet this one was never non-supported >_>
this proves that ideas posted by more famous members get more support

i don't support,this site was supposed to be used to create realistic cards,adding custom sub-types would be pointless,if you really want to make custom ones,just follow j-max's tut

New sub-types aren't unrealistic. New ones are implemented at various points, so they're just as subjective as archetypes.

the cardmaker was supposed to replicate cards as best as possible and unless your card's subtype is real,then it isn't realistic. And i already said you can just use J-max's tut

RE: Sub-Type X - Çå®∂îñål - 06-25-2009 08:04 PM

hell yah i support

RE: Sub-Type X - Corporal Atlas - 06-25-2009 11:34 PM

(06-25-2009 07:55 PM)moneypony Wrote:  
(06-25-2009 07:48 PM)Corporal Atlas Wrote:  
(06-25-2009 04:09 PM)moneypony Wrote:  
(06-25-2009 01:29 PM)~JG~ Wrote:  It's been suggested many times before, and I still support.

And yet this one was never non-supported >_>
this proves that ideas posted by more famous members get more support

i don't support,this site was supposed to be used to create realistic cards,adding custom sub-types would be pointless,if you really want to make custom ones,just follow j-max's tut

New sub-types aren't unrealistic. New ones are implemented at various points, so they're just as subjective as archetypes.

the cardmaker was supposed to replicate cards as best as possible and unless your card's subtype is real,then it isn't realistic. And i already said you can just use J-max's tut
You don't get it, sub-types are allowed to be freely created just as a name and card effect can be made. As long as you follow the proper mechanic of giving them a cohesive ability and all that stuff, they're realistic. And I shouldn't have to use editors outside of a card maker to make my card.

RE: Sub-Type X - LordDemonX - 06-26-2009 12:07 AM

I support this because I want to sub-type

RE: Sub-Type X - Raze - 06-26-2009 12:28 AM

Like the Idea I wanna Support it!

RE: Sub-Type X - Bösitige Zauberer - 06-26-2009 12:34 AM

>.> you can easily do it, like this. There is J-Max's tut.
[Image: 2vcasjr.jpg]

But if you can't figure it out then there should be a feature. I support.

RE: Sub-Type X - Max C. - 06-26-2009 12:40 AM

Yes! ^_^

RE: Sub-Type X - SaTuRnPaLaDiN - 06-26-2009 01:39 AM

I SUPPORT 100 PERCENT!!!

RE: Sub-Type X - jjackv2 - 06-26-2009 04:52 AM

support

RE: Sub-Type X - - Catman - 06-26-2009 08:49 AM

I do not support, as long as you have notebook, you can easily follow J-max's, or JD's tut.

RE: Sub-Type X - Force_Flex - 06-26-2009 01:16 PM

(06-26-2009 01:39 AM)SaTuRnPaLaDiN Wrote:  I SUPPORT 100 PERCENT!!!


RE: Sub-Type X - Mystery Guest - 06-30-2009 03:53 PM

Mystery guest supports, even though there is another way of doing this.

RE: Sub-Type X - Luxord - 07-01-2009 05:42 PM

Oh, Hell. I'll support.

RE: Sub-Type X - Felix Culpa - 07-01-2009 05:43 PM

Suppport >>

RE: Sub-Type X - Xing - 07-01-2009 06:36 PM

Xing Supports.

RE: Sub-Type X - Xander Royce - 07-01-2009 06:58 PM

J-Max/JD's tut you lazy bums.

RE: Sub-Type X - Xing - 07-01-2009 06:59 PM

(07-01-2009 06:58 PM)Xander Royce Wrote:  J-Max/JD's tut you lazy bums.

That takes up to much time.

RE: Sub-Type X - Xander Royce - 07-02-2009 05:09 PM

(07-01-2009 06:59 PM).:Dark Armed Xing:. Wrote:  
(07-01-2009 06:58 PM)Xander Royce Wrote:  J-Max/JD's tut you lazy bums.

That takes up to much time.

Big deal. The card maker never was supposed to support custom subtypes anyways. That's why there is no option to that. The cardmaker already has all the subtypes from the game. If you really want to make custom subtypes, work for it (type, whatever). It's not that hard.

RE: Sub-Type X - Corporal Atlas - 07-02-2009 05:39 PM

It gets annoying when you have to repeatedly do that, it does take up too much time IMO, and fixing this wouldn't take too much time.

RE: Sub-Type X - Chaos Knux - 07-02-2009 07:05 PM



RE: Sub-Type X - ~Oracle - 07-02-2009 08:04 PM

i liek marshmellows

support

RE: Sub-Type X - OMGAKITTY - 07-02-2009 08:24 PM

I think its a good idea. Sure, there are other ways to do it, but by that same value, there are other ways to make an entire card >_>
I could make my card entirely in photoshop, but thats a pain in the ass. Thus, I use the card maker. Same principle.

Plus, if this site were 100% about realism, it wouldn't have the Pop culture and Other subforums.

I support.

RE: Sub-Type X - H3SE - 07-03-2009 07:40 PM

I can see why you would want the ability to make a user-friendly sub-type creator, but have you ever considered that YCMaker has already overhauled the Card Creator code at least 3 times. Doing this would mean a TON of code working and a complete remodeling of the card maker. BTW I do not support...

RE: Sub-Type X - OMGAKITTY - 07-03-2009 08:22 PM

(07-03-2009 07:40 PM)H3SE Wrote:  I can see why you would want the ability to make a user-friendly sub-type creator, but have you ever considered that YCMaker has already overhauled the Card Creator code at least 3 times. Doing this would mean a TON of code working and a complete remodeling of the card maker. BTW I do not support...

No, it wouldn't.

And have you considered how much money YCMaker makes off of this site? He owes us a bit.

RE: Sub-Type X - Armadilloz - 07-03-2009 08:28 PM

(07-03-2009 08:22 PM)OMGAKITTY Wrote:  
(07-03-2009 07:40 PM)H3SE Wrote:  I can see why you would want the ability to make a user-friendly sub-type creator, but have you ever considered that YCMaker has already overhauled the Card Creator code at least 3 times. Doing this would mean a TON of code working and a complete remodeling of the card maker. BTW I do not support...

No, it wouldn't.

And have you considered how much money YCMaker makes off of this site? He owes us a bit.

.....And I doubt it would really effect the whole thing anyway.
For the pull down tab of the subtypes, YCMaker could just add an option called "blank". where it keeps it as an Effect monster, but allows for origionality.

RE: Sub-Type X - Alfred-Kun - 07-04-2009 03:44 AM

(06-25-2009 12:44 PM)Corporal Atlas Wrote:  I just noticed an annoying thing while creating a new card. If you plan on creating a sub-type that doesn't already exist on an effect monster you get: "*type* / *new sub-type* / Effect" which cripples the overall realism in the card. I suggest that there be a new option while selecting what kind of monster card you want to make. Sub-Type X. It makes your card Orange like an effect, but the effect part isn't added. Instead, a bar below has an area to write in what you want to go in that spot instead of effect.

So, before:

[Warrior / Marshmallow / Effect]

After:

[Warrior / Marshmallow]


Just a little suggestion that'd make these cards more realistic.


Supporters(17):
Synchro Duelist
Obsidian
AOJ
JG
jk233_ultimatemaster
Cardinal
Demon X
anbuman
mirage
saturn paladin
jjackv2
max c
force flex
Mystery Guest
Luxord
Dark Armed Xing
One Word

No point. Read J-Max's Custom Subtype Tutorial, it's really easy to understand. No support.

RE: Sub-Type X - Belail - 07-04-2009 03:50 AM

No support.
Some of you people need to stop being lazy, cause that's mah job >=O
Even though YCMaker owes us because he makes money of this site, while he probably sits on his ass watching some TV, doing this wouldn't do much for the site would it now?

RE: Sub-Type X - Corporal Atlas - 07-04-2009 10:38 PM

I really don't see how an alternative method that is much slower and tedious invalidates the addition of a new system that will benefit many. As OMG said, there are different ways to do everything on the card maker.

And I still find the whole "too unrealistic" argument laughable. You're allowed to create whatever type you want, but not sub-type?…

RE: Sub-Type X - true_madara_uchiha - 07-04-2009 10:55 PM

i support (even though it is confussing,lol)

RE: Sub-Type X - Cosmic - 07-05-2009 10:49 AM

You get my supportage

RE: Sub-Type X - ^T^ - 07-05-2009 10:52 AM

i support this but i already know how to make sub types it is not necessary,anyway i support

RE: Sub-Type X (+20 Supporters) - Napoléon - 07-05-2009 11:07 AM

I support this.

RE: Sub-Type X (+20 Supporters) - Blackwing-Master - 07-05-2009 11:54 AM

i support

RE: Sub-Type X (+20 Supporters) - ƬЦЯBӨƧƧ - 07-05-2009 12:15 PM

I support it!

RE: Sub-Type X (+20 Supporters) - Santa's Little Helper - 07-05-2009 12:19 PM

Lol no
you can do that with the internet in 2 seconds
nope no support
woudint make a diffrence because you can do that with the internet

NO SUPPORT

RE: Sub-Type X (+20 Supporters) - Phantom Roxas - 07-05-2009 12:53 PM

I support this because pretty much any other method would be quite tedious.

RE: Sub-Type X (+20 Supporters) - ilikesharks2020 - 07-05-2009 01:12 PM

I support it. I would really like this.

RE: Sub-Type X (+20 Supporters) - Santa's Little Helper - 07-05-2009 01:22 PM

You have it already
YCMaker woudint even waste his time to do this cos to do this you don't need paint GIMP or PhotoShop
so he wont do it even if you had 10000000 supporters

RE: Sub-Type X (+20 Supporters) - DarkForce™ - 07-05-2009 02:31 PM

SUPPORTED
~DarkForce™

RE: Sub-Type X (+20 Supporters) - Spartan-101 - 07-05-2009 02:32 PM

I support.

RE: Sub-Type X (+20 Supporters) - Corporal Atlas - 07-07-2009 07:26 PM

(07-05-2009 01:22 PM).:Dog-King:. Wrote:  You have it already
YCMaker woudint even waste his time to do this cos to do this you don't need paint GIMP or PhotoShop
so he wont do it even if you had 10000000 supporters

Thanks for posting arguments that have already been counter-acted. Twice.

RE: Sub-Type X (30 Supporters) - Monkey - 07-07-2009 07:33 PM

I support. Although there already is a way to do this and its quite simple...

RE: Sub-Type X (30 Supporters) - ^T^ - 07-07-2009 07:50 PM

i already supported and i think that if hunter supports this should be accepted

RE: Sub-Type X (30 Supporters) - sleepy - 07-07-2009 08:48 PM

I support too Very Happy

RE: Sub-Type X (30+ Supporters) - ~Oracle - 07-07-2009 10:31 PM

(07-05-2009 01:22 PM).:Dog-King:. Wrote:  You have it already
YCMaker woudint even waste his time to do this cos to do this you don't need paint GIMP or PhotoShop
so he wont do it even if you had 10000000 supporters

[Image: gtfo_andtakeyourfail.jpg]

RE: Sub-Type X (30+ Supporters) - Serpent Darkness Dragon - 07-07-2009 10:38 PM

U have mah supportz LOL^

RE: Sub-Type X (30+ Supporters) - Fayaz Rahaman - 07-09-2009 02:48 PM

I support this.

RE: Sub-Type X (30+ Supporters) - .:Power Tool Hero:. - 07-10-2009 01:12 PM

I support this proposition

RE: Sub-Type X (30+ Supporters) - Rakesh - 07-13-2009 06:49 AM

I Support.

RE: Sub-Type X (30+ Supporters) - cacnea - 07-13-2009 06:57 AM

I totally support this...

RE: Sub-Type X (35+ Supporters) - Namo™ - 07-13-2009 01:17 PM

Support!

RE: Sub-Type X (35+ Supporters) - Spire - 07-13-2009 01:20 PM

You have my support.

RE: Sub-Type X (37+ Supporters) - darklord33 - 07-13-2009 05:02 PM

i support that to!!!!!!

RE: Sub-Type X (40+ Supporters) - Alfred-Kun - 07-14-2009 12:03 PM

This must be said AGAIN.
Here is a simple tutorial by J-Max and Judgment Dragon that explains how to make custom subtypes easily:
http://forum.yugiohcardmaker.net/thread-98685.html
This is why this suggestion should NOT be implemented, and will NOT be implemented.

Sincerely,

~ Alf

RE: Sub-Type X (40+ Supporters) - Corporal Atlas - 07-14-2009 12:05 PM

Don't say the same thing over again if you're just going to ignore the responses.

RE: Sub-Type X (40+ Supporters) - Alfred-Kun - 07-14-2009 12:11 PM

(07-01-2009 06:58 PM)Xander Royce Wrote:  J-Max/JD's tut you lazy bums.

(07-02-2009 05:09 PM)Xander Royce Wrote:  
(07-01-2009 06:59 PM).:Dark Armed Xing:. Wrote:  
(07-01-2009 06:58 PM)Xander Royce Wrote:  J-Max/JD's tut you lazy bums.

That takes up to much time.

Big deal. The card maker never was supposed to support custom subtypes anyways. That's why there is no option to that. The cardmaker already has all the subtypes from the game. If you really want to make custom subtypes, work for it (type, whatever). It's not that hard.

(07-02-2009 07:05 PM)Chaos Knux Wrote:  

(07-04-2009 03:50 AM)Lucifer Wrote:  No support.
Some of you people need to stop being lazy, cause that's mah job >=O
Even though YCMaker owes us because he makes money of this site, while he probably sits on his ass watching some TV, doing this wouldn't do much for the site would it now?

The above quotes all say the same thing. The tut doesn't take up time at all, it takes mere minutes. It's so SIMPLE! Like .:Dog-King:. said, this idea will never be implemented even if every single member ever registered supported.

RE: Sub-Type X (40+ Supporters) - iHop - 07-14-2009 12:32 PM

I support.

RE: Sub-Type X (40+ Supporters) - Corporal Atlas - 07-14-2009 02:32 PM

(07-14-2009 12:11 PM)Akiza Izayoi Wrote:  
(07-01-2009 06:58 PM)Xander Royce Wrote:  J-Max/JD's tut you lazy bums.

(07-02-2009 05:09 PM)Xander Royce Wrote:  
(07-01-2009 06:59 PM).:Dark Armed Xing:. Wrote:  
(07-01-2009 06:58 PM)Xander Royce Wrote:  J-Max/JD's tut you lazy bums.

That takes up to much time.

Big deal. The card maker never was supposed to support custom subtypes anyways. That's why there is no option to that. The cardmaker already has all the subtypes from the game. If you really want to make custom subtypes, work for it (type, whatever). It's not that hard.

(07-02-2009 07:05 PM)Chaos Knux Wrote:  

(07-04-2009 03:50 AM)Lucifer Wrote:  No support.
Some of you people need to stop being lazy, cause that's mah job >=O
Even though YCMaker owes us because he makes money of this site, while he probably sits on his ass watching some TV, doing this wouldn't do much for the site would it now?

The above quotes all say the same thing. The tut doesn't take up time at all, it takes mere minutes. It's so SIMPLE! Like .:Dog-King:. said, this idea will never be implemented even if every single member ever registered supported.
Honestly, stop posting if you aren't going to respond to the counter arguments. Leave.

RE: Sub-Type X (40+ Supporters) - Ecoboy1324 - 07-14-2009 09:30 PM

i am in full support

RE: Sub-Type X (40+ Supporters) - .:~w0rm~:. - 07-15-2009 02:02 PM

Good idea, you have 1 more supporter.

RE: Sub-Type X (40+ Supporters) - Wanderley - 07-16-2009 10:55 PM

Support

RE: Sub-Type X (40+ Supporters) - SK8TR»‡‡‡» - 07-16-2009 11:02 PM

Support

RE: Sub-Type X (40+ Supporters) - Corporal Atlas - 07-20-2009 07:34 PM

By the way Aki, I tried the tutorial and it doesn't work on my computer, soooooo…

RE: Sub-Type X (40+ Supporters) - WiiOmi - 07-22-2009 04:59 AM

Yes, I support.

How many supporters do you need?

RE: Sub-Type X (40+ Supporters) - Asuka Reishim - 07-22-2009 07:51 AM

I support this even tho i can make fake sub-types. it will save alot of time and computer memory for me! Yay LOL

RE: Sub-Type X (40+ Supporters) - EnkoMaun - 07-22-2009 08:49 AM

Because of that I can't make my morph monsters.

Support.

RE: Sub-Type X (40+ Supporters) - lacikus - 07-22-2009 10:03 AM

Support.

RE: Sub-Type X (40+ Supporters) - MjRiku - 07-22-2009 10:13 AM

Support

RE: Sub-Type X (40+ Supporters) - Corporal Atlas - 07-26-2009 11:48 AM

(07-22-2009 04:59 AM)WiiOmi Wrote:  Yes, I support.

How many supporters do you need?
I'm not sure. It looks like suggestions have to be around 100 before they're considered.

RE: Sub-Type X (48+ Supporters) - The Tin Trooper™ - 07-28-2009 12:57 PM

It would make editing the card easier.. I support.

RE: Sub-Type X (48+ Supporters) - ✖ Jack Atlus ✖ - 07-28-2009 01:01 PM

Tried to get this done before it wasn't added. Support.

RE: Sub-Type X (50+ Supporters) - Seth8001 - 07-29-2009 12:28 PM

I support you completely!

RE: Sub-Type X (50+ Supporters) - sir than - 08-01-2009 08:59 PM

i support
that is awsome

RE: Sub-Type X (50+ Supporters) - Lazer Yoshi - 08-01-2009 10:18 PM

I'm definetely supporting this. ^_^

RE: Sub-Type X (50+ Supporters) - Corporal Atlas - 08-04-2009 11:56 PM

ty all <3

RE: Sub-Type X (50+ Supporters) - Death Bishop - 08-05-2009 03:08 AM

Gimme teh supportz!

;D

RE: Sub-Type X (53+ Supporters) - Corporal Atlas - 08-07-2009 06:15 PM

Bump of love.

RE: Sub-Type X (53+ Supporters) - Symbiote - 08-08-2009 09:35 PM

You could do this with a vanilla or an effect monster, and then you could either recolor the vanilla, or edit out the word effect. Or get someone to do it for you. Anti support.

RE: Sub-Type X (53+ Supporters) - Corporal Atlas - 08-09-2009 04:08 PM

(08-08-2009 09:35 PM)Symbiote Wrote:  You could do this with a vanilla or an effect monster, and then you could either recolor the vanilla, or edit out the word effect. Or get someone to do it for you. Anti support.
This logic is seriously flawed. Because in this sense you could do anything with graphic editing and the entire Card Maker should just be replaced with a blank card for people to edit to their will.

RE: Sub-Type X (53+ Supporters) - AirAgent06 - 08-11-2009 05:20 PM

i support for the sake of it.

RE: Sub-Type X (53+ Supporters) - DesCrow - 08-22-2009 08:43 PM

For great justice!
(I really need this function)

RE: Sub-Type X (53+ Supporters) - Lexadin - 08-23-2009 01:55 PM

I Support this great Idea!

RE: Sub-Type X (53+ Supporters) - Corporal Atlas - 09-16-2009 11:29 PM

How many supports does something usually require to be noticed? >_>

RE: Sub-Type X (53+ Supporters) - iHop - 09-17-2009 01:57 PM

The One made a thread about this, and there is some thread which shows you how to do this. The threadis titled 'Lock'

RE: Sub-Type X (53+ Supporters) - Zexion - 09-17-2009 02:39 PM

Hmmm...
That would be kinda easier if you want a new sub-type....

I.. Support I guess..

RE: Sub-Type X (53+ Supporters) - ЄτЄRИΛL Ω - 09-17-2009 05:35 PM

I support this! Although, we can still buy them in the shop or try ourselves.

RE: Sub-Type X (53+ Supporters) - J-Max - 09-17-2009 07:56 PM

I made a easy to follow 5 Step guide in Tutorials Will support to have it as a real feature though.

RE: Sub-Type X (53+ Supporters) - Valkyrie Gravekeeper - 09-17-2009 08:48 PM

Support.

RE: Sub-Type X (53+ Supporters) - legendhiro - 09-18-2009 02:32 PM

100% support. well, maybe 99%, but same difference...

RE: Sub-Type X (53+ Supporters) - cerberus21 - 09-18-2009 04:54 PM

I could see the use of this. Support half heartedly, because fake types are unrealistic enough w/o fake sub-types, but hey, if you can make them cool...

RE: Sub-Type X (53+ Supporters) - Milk-Chan - 09-18-2009 05:40 PM

It is so simple to do this, and as such, no support.

RE: Sub-Type X (53+ Supporters) - Łεσ™ - 09-18-2009 08:52 PM

I support. It would help =D

RE: Sub-Type X (53+ Supporters) - starfire3 - 09-19-2009 10:25 AM

I know how to make my own sub-types on the card maker, but if what you mean is where we can choose our own custom sub-types, then yes. I support. But if not, I STILL support.

RE: Sub-Type X (57+ Supporters) - Corporal Atlas - 09-21-2009 04:45 PM

(09-18-2009 05:40 PM)Milk-Chan Wrote:  It is so simple to do this, and as such, no support.

It either involves altering the image with photoshop, which is dumb enough as the card maker is supposed to be making the card, or makes you go into the card's inner coding and edit it, a feature unavailable to some computers. Shut up. >_>

RE: Sub-Type X (53+ Supporters) - ♥Łövëły Łäđy♥ - 09-21-2009 04:59 PM

I've always wanted to do that but I could never do it so..

Support