Threaded Mode | Linear Mode

~~Corporal Atlas~~ · (This post was last modified: 08-05-2009 09:27 AM by Corporal Atlas.)

I just noticed an annoying thing while creating a new card. If you plan on creating a sub-type that doesn't already exist on an effect monster you get: "*type* / *new sub-type* / Effect" which cripples the overall realism in the card. I suggest that there be a new option while selecting what kind of monster card you want to make. Sub-Type X. It makes your card Orange like an effect, but the effect part isn't added. Instead, a bar below has an area to write in what you want to go in that spot instead of effect.

So, before:

[Warrior / Marshmallow / Effect]

After:

[Warrior / Marshmallow]

Just a little suggestion that'd make these cards more realistic.

Also, a little post from OMG that addresses many things people keep repeating.

(07-02-2009 08:24 PM)OMGAKITTY Wrote: I think its a good idea. Sure, there are other ways to do it, but by that same value, there are other ways to make an entire card >_>
I could make my card entirely in photoshop, but thats a pain in the ass. Thus, I use the card maker. Same principle.

Plus, if this site were 100% about realism, it wouldn't have the Pop culture and Other subforums.

I support.

Supporters 1-50 (Click to View)

Seth001
The Than
Lazer Yoshi
Death Bishop

Crow™ · 06-25-2009, 12:47 PM

You have my most valued support. Sounds cool..

-The Dark Master- · 06-25-2009, 12:48 PM

Supported.

A●O●J · (This post was last modified: 06-25-2009 01:00 PM by A●O●J.)

I support

~JG~ · 06-25-2009, 01:29 PM

It's been suggested many times before, and I still support.

moneypony · 06-25-2009, 04:09 PM

(06-25-2009 01:29 PM)~JG~ Wrote: It's been suggested many times before, and I still support.

And yet this one was never non-supported >_>
this proves that ideas posted by more famous members get more support

i don't support,this site was supposed to be used to create realistic cards,adding custom sub-types would be pointless,if you really want to make custom ones,just follow j-max's tut

jk233_ultimatemaster · 06-25-2009, 04:11 PM

I support too!

Kale · 06-25-2009, 07:45 PM

you know, there is a tut where you can copy the properties of the card, put it into a word document, find the part of the code where it says the subtype, then add in your own word, the place it in the url of your web browser, and when you hit enter it has that subtype without the /Effect on it.

find it...?

it should be in tuts.

~~Corporal Atlas~~ · 06-25-2009, 07:48 PM

(06-25-2009 04:09 PM)moneypony Wrote:
(06-25-2009 01:29 PM)~JG~ Wrote: It's been suggested many times before, and I still support.

And yet this one was never non-supported >_>
this proves that ideas posted by more famous members get more support

i don't support,this site was supposed to be used to create realistic cards,adding custom sub-types would be pointless,if you really want to make custom ones,just follow j-max's tut

New sub-types aren't unrealistic. New ones are implemented at various points, so they're just as subjective as archetypes.

moneypony · 06-25-2009, 07:55 PM

(06-25-2009 07:48 PM)Corporal Atlas Wrote:
(06-25-2009 04:09 PM)moneypony Wrote:
(06-25-2009 01:29 PM)~JG~ Wrote: It's been suggested many times before, and I still support.

And yet this one was never non-supported >_>
this proves that ideas posted by more famous members get more support

i don't support,this site was supposed to be used to create realistic cards,adding custom sub-types would be pointless,if you really want to make custom ones,just follow j-max's tut

New sub-types aren't unrealistic. New ones are implemented at various points, so they're just as subjective as archetypes.

the cardmaker was supposed to replicate cards as best as possible and unless your card's subtype is real,then it isn't realistic. And i already said you can just use J-max's tut

Çå®∂îñål · 06-25-2009, 08:04 PM

hell yah i support

~~Corporal Atlas~~ · 06-25-2009, 11:34 PM

(06-25-2009 07:55 PM)moneypony Wrote:
(06-25-2009 07:48 PM)Corporal Atlas Wrote:
(06-25-2009 04:09 PM)moneypony Wrote:
(06-25-2009 01:29 PM)~JG~ Wrote: It's been suggested many times before, and I still support.

And yet this one was never non-supported >_>
this proves that ideas posted by more famous members get more support

i don't support,this site was supposed to be used to create realistic cards,adding custom sub-types would be pointless,if you really want to make custom ones,just follow j-max's tut

New sub-types aren't unrealistic. New ones are implemented at various points, so they're just as subjective as archetypes.

the cardmaker was supposed to replicate cards as best as possible and unless your card's subtype is real,then it isn't realistic. And i already said you can just use J-max's tut

You don't get it, sub-types are allowed to be freely created just as a name and card effect can be made. As long as you follow the proper mechanic of giving them a cohesive ability and all that stuff, they're realistic. And I shouldn't have to use editors outside of a card maker to make my card.

LordDemonX · 06-26-2009, 12:07 AM

I support this because I want to sub-type

Raze · (This post was last modified: 06-26-2009 12:28 AM by Raze.)

Like the Idea I wanna Support it!

Bösitige Zauberer · (This post was last modified: 06-26-2009 12:37 AM by Bösitige Zauberer.)

>.> you can easily do it, like this. There is J-Max's tut.
[Image: 2vcasjr.jpg]

But if you can't figure it out then there should be a feature. I support.

Max C. · 06-26-2009, 12:40 AM

Yes! ^_^

SaTuRnPaLaDiN · 06-26-2009, 01:39 AM

I SUPPORT 100 PERCENT!!!

jjackv2 · 06-26-2009, 04:52 AM

support

- Catman · (This post was last modified: 06-26-2009 08:49 AM by - Catman.)

I do not support, as long as you have notebook, you can easily follow J-max's, or JD's tut.

Force_Flex · 06-26-2009, 01:16 PM

(06-26-2009 01:39 AM)SaTuRnPaLaDiN Wrote: I SUPPORT 100 PERCENT!!!