Threaded Mode | Linear Mode

**Chaos Pudding** · 11-03-2009, 04:37 PM

(11-03-2009 04:21 PM)kingdom Neos Wrote:
(11-03-2009 02:17 PM)Chaos Pudding Wrote:
(11-03-2009 12:32 PM)kingdom Neos Wrote: When looking at these rules I think:
1. With whats going on why do we need the title of the thread needs to be a card name instead of being something funny or such >.>?
2. Those who just lock a topic when a member tells a mod nicly that they could just simply look it up on yugioh wikia or such does that seem fair look to you.

I mean seriously some mods just say theirs a title rule which when looking at it all it just says...

Quote:Basically, use your head. If a thread isn't generating useful discussion, it will be locked. This includes duplicate threads, threads that deal with the same subject as a thread that was recently posted (probably within 5-7 days of the new thread), "CHECK MY BINDER"/trade threads, and other assorted threads.
any mention of needing to be name of card your talking about, no >.>

also an instant lock added by warning for is sorta uncalled for Chaos Pudding ¬_¬

If you had read my announcement, then you would know why I've started having people put the name of their card in their topic title. You can still have funny titles, just have the name of the card somewhere in the topic. Also, if you notice, I have the phrase, "and other assorted threads", which basically means anything that I find to be stupid. So even under this rule I could lock your threads for not having the name of the card in the topic title.

Oh, and if you just post a picture of the OCG card, with no effect or even a link, then I'll lock it, too, until you change it so that it has a name or a link or both. No exceptions.
Question how can I if its locked.

Either PM me or make a new topic that follows the rules. I had forgotten that non-mods can't edit locked topics, even if they're their own.

kingdom Neos · 11-03-2009, 05:13 PM

(11-03-2009 04:37 PM)Chaos Pudding Wrote:
(11-03-2009 04:21 PM)kingdom Neos Wrote:
(11-03-2009 02:17 PM)Chaos Pudding Wrote:
(11-03-2009 12:32 PM)kingdom Neos Wrote: When looking at these rules I think:
1. With whats going on why do we need the title of the thread needs to be a card name instead of being something funny or such >.>?
2. Those who just lock a topic when a member tells a mod nicly that they could just simply look it up on yugioh wikia or such does that seem fair look to you.

I mean seriously some mods just say theirs a title rule which when looking at it all it just says...

Quote:Basically, use your head. If a thread isn't generating useful discussion, it will be locked. This includes duplicate threads, threads that deal with the same subject as a thread that was recently posted (probably within 5-7 days of the new thread), "CHECK MY BINDER"/trade threads, and other assorted threads.
any mention of needing to be name of card your talking about, no >.>

also an instant lock added by warning for is sorta uncalled for Chaos Pudding ¬_¬

If you had read my announcement, then you would know why I've started having people put the name of their card in their topic title. You can still have funny titles, just have the name of the card somewhere in the topic. Also, if you notice, I have the phrase, "and other assorted threads", which basically means anything that I find to be stupid. So even under this rule I could lock your threads for not having the name of the card in the topic title.

Oh, and if you just post a picture of the OCG card, with no effect or even a link, then I'll lock it, too, until you change it so that it has a name or a link or both. No exceptions.
Question how can I if its locked.

Either PM me or make a new topic that follows the rules. I had forgotten that non-mods can't edit locked topics, even if they're their own.

okay then I'll PM you the New title.

Alfred-Kun · 11-06-2009, 02:48 PM

This is why becoming a Mod wrecks your personality [/thread].
xD

Anyhow, I think it's a bit unfair to call it the 'kingdom Neos' clause. His name is kind of dragged down and dirtied.

**Chaos Pudding** · 11-07-2009, 06:54 PM

(11-06-2009 02:48 PM)Alfred-Kun Wrote: This is why becoming a Mod wrecks your personality [/thread].
xD

Anyhow, I think it's a bit unfair to call it the 'kingdom Neos' clause. His name is kind of dragged down and dirtied.

I've always been this vengeful. And I might change it later if kingdom Neos decides he wants to stop being stupid.

Alfred-Kun · 11-11-2009, 03:39 PM

(11-07-2009 06:54 PM)Chaos Pudding Wrote:
(11-06-2009 02:48 PM)Alfred-Kun Wrote: This is why becoming a Mod wrecks your personality [/thread].
xD

Anyhow, I think it's a bit unfair to call it the 'kingdom Neos' clause. His name is kind of dragged down and dirtied.

I've always been this vengeful. And I might change it later if kingdom Neos decides he wants to stop being stupid.

I agree, but look at Hunter and Icy.

Yugiohrulez! · 11-11-2009, 03:42 PM

hmmm, so what exactly is wrong with the old rules?

**Chaos Pudding** · 11-11-2009, 06:31 PM

(11-11-2009 03:42 PM)Yugiohrulez! Wrote: hmmm, so what exactly is wrong with the old rules?

I didn't like them.

Manjoume Thunder · 11-21-2009, 02:55 PM

Can you make a rule that forbids discussions for horrible cards.
I don't mind discussions about a card that works good in a T3 deck but when we start discussing things like Dark Effigy ....

Kyosuke Kiryu · 11-21-2009, 02:56 PM

(11-21-2009 02:55 PM)Manjoume Thunder Wrote: Can you make a rule that forbids discussions for horrible cards.
I don't mind discussions about a card that works good in a T3 deck but when we start discussing things like Dark Effigy ....

That.

-Griffin · 11-21-2009, 04:42 PM

(11-21-2009 02:56 PM)Qal'at Wrote:
(11-21-2009 02:55 PM)Manjoume Thunder Wrote: Can you make a rule that forbids discussions for horrible cards.
I don't mind discussions about a card that works good in a T3 deck but when we start discussing things like Dark Effigy ....

That.

+Support

**Icyblue** · 11-21-2009, 04:44 PM

(11-21-2009 04:42 PM)-Griffin Wrote:
(11-21-2009 02:56 PM)Qal'at Wrote:
(11-21-2009 02:55 PM)Manjoume Thunder Wrote: Can you make a rule that forbids discussions for horrible cards.
I don't mind discussions about a card that works good in a T3 deck but when we start discussing things like Dark Effigy ....

That.

+Support

+Rare Fish. Everybody needs some love.

Alfred-Kun · 11-23-2009, 04:47 PM

How about a 'No Discussing Vanillas' (except iconic/famous ones) rule.

kingdom Neos · 01-21-2010, 03:04 PM

(08-04-2009 05:14 PM)Chaos Pudding Wrote: 2a: Individual card discussion topics (The kingdom Neos Clause): I thought that an announcement would have been enough, but apparently it wasn't enough. If your card discussion topic title does not include the name of the card, I will edit your title to include the name of the card and I will warn you 10%. If your username is "kingdom Neos" or you share an IP with the user "kingdom Neos" I will warn you 20%. If I cannot identify what card the discussion is about right off the bat, then I will lock the thread until you yourself edit the topic title, and I will warn you 20%. If your username is "kingdom Neos" or you share an IP with the user "kingdom Neos" I will warn you 30%. This is why you don't want to get pissy with me, kingdom Neos.

Wouldn't this lead to...

1. Abuse of position
2. Harassment to user
3. Possible Ban Hammer from head Admin

Nuff said

Xander Royce · 01-21-2010, 03:06 PM

(01-21-2010 03:04 PM)kingdom Neos Wrote:
(08-04-2009 05:14 PM)Chaos Pudding Wrote: 2a: Individual card discussion topics (The kingdom Neos Clause): I thought that an announcement would have been enough, but apparently it wasn't enough. If your card discussion topic title does not include the name of the card, I will edit your title to include the name of the card and I will warn you 10%. If your username is "kingdom Neos" or you share an IP with the user "kingdom Neos" I will warn you 20%. If I cannot identify what card the discussion is about right off the bat, then I will lock the thread until you yourself edit the topic title, and I will warn you 20%. If your username is "kingdom Neos" or you share an IP with the user "kingdom Neos" I will warn you 30%. This is why you don't want to get pissy with me, kingdom Neos.

Wouldn't this lead to...

1. Abuse of position
2. Harassment to user
3. Possible Ban Hammer from head Admin

Nuff said

Look, this rule was set in place because it wouldn't make it hard to search for cards with the Search Option. And please, why don't you just stop being so bitchy KN? Just add the freaking name to the title, it's not that hard.

kingdom Neos · 01-21-2010, 05:37 PM

(01-21-2010 03:06 PM)Xander Royce Wrote:
(01-21-2010 03:04 PM)kingdom Neos Wrote:
(08-04-2009 05:14 PM)Chaos Pudding Wrote: 2a: Individual card discussion topics (The kingdom Neos Clause): I thought that an announcement would have been enough, but apparently it wasn't enough. If your card discussion topic title does not include the name of the card, I will edit your title to include the name of the card and I will warn you 10%. If your username is "kingdom Neos" or you share an IP with the user "kingdom Neos" I will warn you 20%. If I cannot identify what card the discussion is about right off the bat, then I will lock the thread until you yourself edit the topic title, and I will warn you 20%. If your username is "kingdom Neos" or you share an IP with the user "kingdom Neos" I will warn you 30%. This is why you don't want to get pissy with me, kingdom Neos.

Wouldn't this lead to...

1. Abuse of position
2. Harassment to user
3. Possible Ban Hammer from head Admin

Nuff said

Look, this rule was set in place because it wouldn't make it hard to search for cards with the Search Option. And please, why don't you just stop being so bitchy KN? Just add the freaking name to the title, it's not that hard.

Its not that if you looked at your own rule it directs itself mostly at me.

am not the one to b**** but you instead trying to get a full out ban hit one my while trying to follow the forums rules while setting 30% warning aswell as IP ban which includes thos assosiated with me or others using the same username >.> which I do note "Is uncalled for"

Eurynome · 01-21-2010, 05:59 PM

(01-21-2010 05:37 PM)kingdom Neos Wrote:
(01-21-2010 03:06 PM)Xander Royce Wrote:
(01-21-2010 03:04 PM)kingdom Neos Wrote:
(08-04-2009 05:14 PM)Chaos Pudding Wrote: 2a: Individual card discussion topics (The kingdom Neos Clause): I thought that an announcement would have been enough, but apparently it wasn't enough. If your card discussion topic title does not include the name of the card, I will edit your title to include the name of the card and I will warn you 10%. If your username is "kingdom Neos" or you share an IP with the user "kingdom Neos" I will warn you 20%. If I cannot identify what card the discussion is about right off the bat, then I will lock the thread until you yourself edit the topic title, and I will warn you 20%. If your username is "kingdom Neos" or you share an IP with the user "kingdom Neos" I will warn you 30%. This is why you don't want to get pissy with me, kingdom Neos.

Wouldn't this lead to...

1. Abuse of position
2. Harassment to user
3. Possible Ban Hammer from head Admin

Nuff said

Look, this rule was set in place because it wouldn't make it hard to search for cards with the Search Option. And please, why don't you just stop being so bitchy KN? Just add the freaking name to the title, it's not that hard.
Its not that if you looked at your own rule it directs itself mostly at me.

am not the one to b**** but you instead trying to get a full out ban hit one my while trying to follow the forums rules while setting 30% warning aswell as IP ban which includes thos assosiated with me or others using the same username >.> which I do note "Is uncalled for"

I have absolutely no idea what you just said.

But I do have a feeling Chaos is going to ban you soon.

**Chaos Pudding** · 01-22-2010, 11:18 AM

kingdom Neos, shut up. Follow the rules, and I won't have to have the rule named after you.

**Crab Helmet** · 01-25-2010, 03:30 AM

(01-21-2010 03:04 PM)kingdom Neos Wrote:
(08-04-2009 05:14 PM)Chaos Pudding Wrote: 2a: Individual card discussion topics (The kingdom Neos Clause): I thought that an announcement would have been enough, but apparently it wasn't enough. If your card discussion topic title does not include the name of the card, I will edit your title to include the name of the card and I will warn you 10%. If your username is "kingdom Neos" or you share an IP with the user "kingdom Neos" I will warn you 20%. If I cannot identify what card the discussion is about right off the bat, then I will lock the thread until you yourself edit the topic title, and I will warn you 20%. If your username is "kingdom Neos" or you share an IP with the user "kingdom Neos" I will warn you 30%. This is why you don't want to get pissy with me, kingdom Neos.

Wouldn't this lead to...

1. Abuse of position
2. Harassment to user
3. Possible Ban Hammer from head Admin

Nuff said

No, actually, it wouldn't. Next question?