Threaded Mode | Linear Mode

**Chaos Pudding** · 11-03-2009, 04:37 PM

(11-03-2009 04:21 PM)kingdom Neos Wrote:
(11-03-2009 02:17 PM)Chaos Pudding Wrote:
(11-03-2009 12:32 PM)kingdom Neos Wrote: When looking at these rules I think:
1. With whats going on why do we need the title of the thread needs to be a card name instead of being something funny or such >.>?
2. Those who just lock a topic when a member tells a mod nicly that they could just simply look it up on yugioh wikia or such does that seem fair look to you.

I mean seriously some mods just say theirs a title rule which when looking at it all it just says...

Quote:Basically, use your head. If a thread isn't generating useful discussion, it will be locked. This includes duplicate threads, threads that deal with the same subject as a thread that was recently posted (probably within 5-7 days of the new thread), "CHECK MY BINDER"/trade threads, and other assorted threads.
any mention of needing to be name of card your talking about, no >.>

also an instant lock added by warning for is sorta uncalled for Chaos Pudding ¬_¬

If you had read my announcement, then you would know why I've started having people put the name of their card in their topic title. You can still have funny titles, just have the name of the card somewhere in the topic. Also, if you notice, I have the phrase, "and other assorted threads", which basically means anything that I find to be stupid. So even under this rule I could lock your threads for not having the name of the card in the topic title.

Oh, and if you just post a picture of the OCG card, with no effect or even a link, then I'll lock it, too, until you change it so that it has a name or a link or both. No exceptions.
Question how can I if its locked.

Either PM me or make a new topic that follows the rules. I had forgotten that non-mods can't edit locked topics, even if they're their own.

kingdom Neos · 11-03-2009, 05:13 PM

(11-03-2009 04:37 PM)Chaos Pudding Wrote:
(11-03-2009 04:21 PM)kingdom Neos Wrote:
(11-03-2009 02:17 PM)Chaos Pudding Wrote:
(11-03-2009 12:32 PM)kingdom Neos Wrote: When looking at these rules I think:
1. With whats going on why do we need the title of the thread needs to be a card name instead of being something funny or such >.>?
2. Those who just lock a topic when a member tells a mod nicly that they could just simply look it up on yugioh wikia or such does that seem fair look to you.

I mean seriously some mods just say theirs a title rule which when looking at it all it just says...

Quote:Basically, use your head. If a thread isn't generating useful discussion, it will be locked. This includes duplicate threads, threads that deal with the same subject as a thread that was recently posted (probably within 5-7 days of the new thread), "CHECK MY BINDER"/trade threads, and other assorted threads.
any mention of needing to be name of card your talking about, no >.>

also an instant lock added by warning for is sorta uncalled for Chaos Pudding ¬_¬

If you had read my announcement, then you would know why I've started having people put the name of their card in their topic title. You can still have funny titles, just have the name of the card somewhere in the topic. Also, if you notice, I have the phrase, "and other assorted threads", which basically means anything that I find to be stupid. So even under this rule I could lock your threads for not having the name of the card in the topic title.

Oh, and if you just post a picture of the OCG card, with no effect or even a link, then I'll lock it, too, until you change it so that it has a name or a link or both. No exceptions.
Question how can I if its locked.

Either PM me or make a new topic that follows the rules. I had forgotten that non-mods can't edit locked topics, even if they're their own.

okay then I'll PM you the New title.

Alfred-Kun · 11-06-2009, 02:48 PM

This is why becoming a Mod wrecks your personality [/thread].
xD

Anyhow, I think it's a bit unfair to call it the 'kingdom Neos' clause. His name is kind of dragged down and dirtied.

**Chaos Pudding** · 11-07-2009, 06:54 PM

(11-06-2009 02:48 PM)Alfred-Kun Wrote: This is why becoming a Mod wrecks your personality [/thread].
xD

Anyhow, I think it's a bit unfair to call it the 'kingdom Neos' clause. His name is kind of dragged down and dirtied.

I've always been this vengeful. And I might change it later if kingdom Neos decides he wants to stop being stupid.

Alfred-Kun · 11-11-2009, 03:39 PM

(11-07-2009 06:54 PM)Chaos Pudding Wrote:
(11-06-2009 02:48 PM)Alfred-Kun Wrote: This is why becoming a Mod wrecks your personality [/thread].
xD

Anyhow, I think it's a bit unfair to call it the 'kingdom Neos' clause. His name is kind of dragged down and dirtied.

I've always been this vengeful. And I might change it later if kingdom Neos decides he wants to stop being stupid.

I agree, but look at Hunter and Icy.

Yugiohrulez! · 11-11-2009, 03:42 PM

hmmm, so what exactly is wrong with the old rules?

**Chaos Pudding** · 11-11-2009, 06:31 PM

(11-11-2009 03:42 PM)Yugiohrulez! Wrote: hmmm, so what exactly is wrong with the old rules?

I didn't like them.

Manjoume Thunder · Today, 02:55 PM

Can you make a rule that forbids discussions for horrible cards.
I don't mind discussions about a card that works good in a T3 deck but when we start discussing things like Dark Effigy ....