CONTINUED: Democracy on YCM!

[Opalmoon]

Majortim: I still don't see what democracy, communism or dictatorship has to do with an Internet forum based on Yugioh.

Muluck: I get what you mean, of course the mods aren't 100% neutral and unbiased. No one is. But then those "jurors" probably won't be either, unless they're from some alien species.
Yeah, just saying how I see it and why it wouldn't work well. I'd say the jurors right now are the members themselves. Because usually when mods make rules on this forum they keep the thread as well as their PM inbox open for discussion so if someone has a problem they can just say it. But that doesn't happen here, people prefer to cause a massive dramatic uprise instead of discussing stuff in an open rules or modding discussion thread.

And I understand every word you say, also if you speak normally to me.

Still no support or non-support cause I don't really grab the point here.0_o

Quote:I don't remember mentioning that there wasn't.
Let me ask you something, have you ever been on Jury Duty? Or even mock Jury duties in school?

Quote:You see what I am getting at?

,___,

EDIT: Oops a mod changed his name to Napoleon, I lied. ._.

[Muluck]

(11-03-2009 05:04 PM)Opalmoon Wrote:  Majortim: I still don't see what democracy, communism or dictatorship has to do with an Internet forum based on Yugioh.

Muluck: I get what you mean, of course the mods aren't 100% neutral and unbiased. No one is. But then those "jurors" probably won't be either, unless they're from some alien species.
Yeah, just saying how I see it and why it wouldn't work well. I'd say the jurors right now are the members themselves. Because usually when mods make rules on this forum they keep the thread as well as their PM inbox open for discussion so if someone has a problem they can just say it. But that doesn't happen here, people prefer to cause a massive dramatic uprise instead of discussing stuff in an open rules or modding discussion thread.

And I understand every word you say, also if you speak normally to me.

Still no support or non-support cause I don't really grab the point here.0_o

Quote:I don't remember mentioning that there wasn't.
Let me ask you something, have you ever been on Jury Duty? Or even mock Jury duties in school?

Quote:You see what I am getting at?

,___,

EDIT: Oops a mod changed his name to Napoleon, I lied. ._.

And I understand every word you say, also if you speak normally to me.

Am I not speaking normally? I apologize if you think I'm speaking in a tone other than respect.

Still no support or non-support cause I don't really grab the point here.0_o

You do realize I am against the-Or do not support- this members suggestion? I was justbeing courteous by giving an option that might solve this problem on a more neutral level.

,___,

EDIT: Oops a mod changed his name to Napoleon, I lied. ._.

Okay, you lost me. What did I miss? Or what did you edit out?

[Opalmoon]

It's ok bro.

And I don't support this members' suggestion either because I don't see the problem here.

[.:Abyss Wander:.]

(10-01-2009 07:44 PM)Lemniscate Wrote:  Democracy is an incredibly stupid form of government, as has been proven by every democracy in history, all of which crash and die away.
The people can't be trusted to make an informed and well considered decision on these things, and giving them the power to do so is likely to give rise to anarchy on the site, as people begin to attempt to create ways that they can sway a vote in their favor, or just make decisions that end up being entirely bad for the site.
On an internet forum, where there is no pre-screening for qualities for members, it is much more stable to have a organization based on the decisions of the site's creator, and the people they appoint to assist them.

The second post owned this thread.
No support.