|
Traditional Hopeless Dragon
|
|
11-07-2009, 01:12 PM
(This post was last modified: 11-13-2009 11:39 AM by jabber2033.)
Post: #1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Traditional Hopeless Dragon
Exactly what the title says. Rate/Fix/Comment.
Monsters: 21 1x Dark Armed Dragon 1x Dark Magician of Chaos 1x Chaos Emperor Dragon 1x Light and Darkness Dragon 3x Red-Eyes Darkness Metal Dragon 2x Dark Horus 3x Red-Eyes Wyvern 2x Armageddon Knight 2x Phantom of Chaos 2x Dark Grepher 1x Witch of the Black Forest 1x Cyber Jar 1x Magician of Faith Spells: 14 2x Trade-In 2x Allure of Darkness 1x Pot of Greed 1x Graceful Charity 1x Monster Reborn 1x Premature Burial 1x Raigeki 1x Dark Hole 1x Card of Safe Return 1x Harpie's Feather Duster 1x Dimension Fusion 1x Dragon's Mirror Traps: 6 1x Call of the Haunted 1x Ring of Destruction 1x Mirror Force 1x Return from the Different Dimension 2x Bottomless Trap Hole Extra: 2 2x Five-Headed Dragon |
|||
|
11-07-2009, 05:43 PM
Post: #2
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Traditional Hopeless Dragon
-1 Allure of darkness
+1 Snatch steal? Maybe a mirror force Or am i doing it wrong :/. |
|||
|
11-07-2009, 05:54 PM
Post: #3
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Traditional Hopeless Dragon
very nice. i would love to duel against this deck. '
but don't you need a red eyes black dragon and a metalmorph to summon red eyes darkness metal dragon? just asking. besides thati think its cool. 9.5/10 |
|||
|
11-07-2009, 05:57 PM
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Traditional Hopeless Dragon
(11-07-2009 05:54 PM)LuffyLaxer Wrote: very nice. i would love to duel against this deck. ' No. This is REDMD: http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Red-Eyes_Da...tal_Dragon As for Mirror Force, Not sure what to neg for it. Maybe get rid of Ring of D. |
|||
|
11-08-2009, 05:30 AM
(This post was last modified: 11-08-2009 05:33 AM by Rose.)
Post: #5
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Traditional Hopeless Dragon
(11-07-2009 05:57 PM)jabber2033 Wrote:(11-07-2009 05:54 PM)LuffyLaxer Wrote: very nice. i would love to duel against this deck. ' Maybe a 41 card, i actally understand how this decks work now Maybe magician of faith? She doesn't look 100% needed, atleast the way i see it. EDIT: Maybe play a giant trunade? i just don't know what to neg. |
|||
|
11-08-2009, 11:54 AM
(This post was last modified: 11-08-2009 11:55 AM by jabber2033.)
Post: #6
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Traditional Hopeless Dragon
(11-08-2009 05:30 AM)05ryamar Wrote: Maybe a 41 card, i actally understand how this decks work now Magician of Faith is one of those cards that belongs in every deck no matter what you're playing. I'm not negging it. Although I agree that 41 cards isn't too bad. Especially with all of the draw power I have. |
|||
|
11-09-2009, 03:14 PM
Post: #7
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Traditional Hopeless Dragon
BUMP!
|
|||
|
11-10-2009, 06:06 PM
Post: #8
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Traditional Hopeless Dragon
I doubt this thing is perfect. I need comments/fixes.
|
|||
|
11-11-2009, 04:39 AM
Post: #9
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Traditional Hopeless Dragon
i wouldnt neg ring personally...
i'd neg either a Armageddon Knight or Grepher for Snatch. |
|||
|
11-11-2009, 01:04 PM
Post: #10
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Traditional Hopeless Dragon
My Opinion:
My opinion (Click to View) My Rating (Click to View) |
|||
|
11-11-2009, 01:08 PM
Post: #11
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Traditional Hopeless Dragon
(11-11-2009 01:04 PM)Oleon4 Wrote: My Opinion: This deck isn't IRL (That's In Real Life). This is just a "dream deck" of sorts. And REDMD is a promo you can get by subscribing to Shonen Jump magazine. (I think). |
|||
|
11-11-2009, 02:28 PM
Post: #12
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Traditional Hopeless Dragon
Reinforcement of the Army?
|
|||
|
11-11-2009, 02:38 PM
Post: #13
|
|||
|
|||
| RE: Traditional Hopeless Dragon | |||
|
11-11-2009, 10:17 PM
Post: #14
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Traditional Hopeless Dragon
Find a way to play Chaos Emperor Dragon...
|
|||
|
11-12-2009, 12:45 AM
Post: #15
|
|||
|
|||
| RE: Traditional Hopeless Dragon | |||
|
11-12-2009, 07:15 AM
Post: #16
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Traditional Hopeless Dragon
oh yeah, forgot bout that guy.
maybe try LADD? he IS a light after all... |
|||
|
11-12-2009, 10:22 AM
Post: #17
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Traditional Hopeless Dragon
Why does every traditional deck have to use CED?
I know he's good and all, but I just don't have the room for CED plus a few light monsters. CED will probably be sided at best. |
|||
|
11-12-2009, 12:44 PM
Post: #18
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Traditional Hopeless Dragon
Maybe post a side deck for this?
|
|||
|
11-13-2009, 02:20 AM
Post: #19
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Traditional Hopeless Dragon
side CED and 2 LADD
there's your light right there. and maybe side a third Trade-In if your running the extra Lv8's. Traditional has to use CED because he IS the embodiment of Traditional. The ridicolous low cost yet extreme effect is what Trad is all about. Refer to Raigeki. |
|||
|
11-13-2009, 03:20 AM
Post: #20
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Traditional Hopeless Dragon
(11-13-2009 02:20 AM)Sephiroth_The_Legend Wrote: side CED and 2 LADD Maybe drop Dark Horus for it? |
|||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|

Card Maker
Search
Member List
Calendar
Help




