Thread Closed 
The Rules
03-17-2008, 07:28 PM (This post was last modified: 02-26-2009 05:26 PM by JesusofChaos™.)
Post: #1
The Rules
Because I've changed my mind and decided that a topic about this is necessary; it's just that we need different rules. These rules act in addition to the official site rules.

Throughout this topic, I'll be using the following imaginary decklist as a sample decklist:

Bubble Crash, 3 Larvae Moth, 2 Thestalos the Firestorm Monarch, Swords of Revealing Light, 3 Magical Hats

Obviously, this deck is far too small to be legal; it is just an example.


1. Line Breaks

When posting your deck, don't post everything in one line; put each card on a different line. For example:

1 Bubble Crash
3 Larvae Moth
2 Thestalos the Firestorm Monarch
1 Swords of Revealing Light
3 Magical Hats

This makes the deck much easier to read. However, don't put blank lines between each card; they should be together, but on separate lines.


2. Organization

When posting your decklist, divide it up into Monsters, Spell, and Traps.

Example:

Monsters

2 Thestalos the Firsestorm Monarch
3 Larvae Moth

Spells

1 Bubble Crash
1 Swords of Revealing Light

Traps

3 Magical Hats

Doing this makes your deck much, much easier to read. If you wish, you may also divide your monsters into Tribute Monsters and Non-Tribute Monsters, but this is optional. You don't need to use underlines for the section titles; I personally prefer bold, for example.


3. Numbers

At the start of each section, say how many of that type of card is included in your deck. For example:

Monsters (5)

2 Thestalos the Firsestorm Monarch
3 Larvae Moth

Spells (2)

1 Bubble Crash
1 Swords of Revealing Light

Traps (3)

3 Magical Hats

This makes it much easier for people to see your deck's balance.


4. Topic Titles

The old sticky said that deck names should be along the lines of "My Deck" or "Crab Helmet's Deck". This is a bad system, was not used when it was officially sanctioned, and is no longer even remotely encouraged.

It is best for your topic title and deck title to be descriptive of the deck's function. For example, an Immortal Bushi deck could be called "Bushi Deck" or "Gadget Warrior" or something. Decks titled "My Deck" are generally looked down on, especially after a recent series of Generic Beatdown decks of that title.


5. Legality

Decks posted here must be legal under the March 2008 Advanced Format banlist, which can be found in the other sticky on this board. If your deck contains any banned cards, such as Yata-Garasu, or too many copies of Limited or Semi-Limited cards, such as 3 Overload Fusion, it cannot be posted here.

If the only thing that prevents your deck from being legal is that it contains a single copy of a banned card, or one copy each of multiple banned cards, then it is legal in Traditional Format and may be posted in the appropriate sub-forum.

If your deck contains 2 or 3 copies of a banned or limited card, or if it contains 3 copies of semi-limited card, then it is illegal in all formats and cannot be posted anywhere.

The only main exception to this rule is that you may post a deck that follows the September 2007 format instead of the March 2008 format for the purposes of use on Game King Online, which has not been updated with the new banlist yet. If this is the case, you must say so within the topic.

A few player-created banlists exist, most notably the Atem Penultimate Banlist. You may post decks that use these, but if you do so, you must state that you are using such a banlist, and should post the banlist within spoiler tags for the benefit of those who are not familiar with it.


6. Flaming

Yes, this is one of the general site rules, but because of recent disputes over what constitutes flaming, I feel that it should be defined here in more detail.

"Flaming" is a direct insult to a person. Example: "You are an idiot".

Speaking ill of a person's deck is not considered flaming. For example, "this deck sucks" is perfectly acceptable.

Speaking ill of a person's recommendations is also not considered flaming. For example, "your suggestions suck" is perfectly acceptable.

Speaking ill of a person's playing ability is generally not considered flaming. For example, "you suck at this game" or "learn to play" are perfectly acceptable. However, this can become flaming if done improperly; for example, "only an idiot could be this bad at this game" would be considered flaming.

Amendature 6.1 (26/02/09)
After several complaints I have decided that the above phrases directly contravene the sites regulations. Therefore people must be more specific when posting that a deck is bad. However it is the person's who is upset with the comments responsibility to report the offending post and not the moderators to find the post by randomly searching through posts.


7. Deckbuilding

Before you post your deck, read the Basic Deckbuilding FAQ - Illustrated Edition:

Basic Deckbuilding FAQ - Illustrated Edition (Click to View)

It covers the most common mistakes seen here, and there's no need to waste everyone's time with your deck if you haven't learned the basics, such as by making 70-card decks.


8. The Xander Clause

If your deck contains obscure or unreleased OCG-only cards, your post should also contain either a link to a description of those cards or a copy-paste of the effects of those cards.

9. The Jack Witt Clause

All deck topics are treated as rate and fix topics. This means that, when you post your deck, you will receive comments and evaluations of the deck's quality from other members and suggestions as to how to improve it. If you cannot deal with this, then do not post your deck. If you post your deck and then show that you cannot or will not accept constructive criticism, you will not only appear childish but also run the risk of having your topics closed.


10. Deck Size

Under new rules all decks must be under 50 cards in size. This is to help with people fixing your deck. Any decks over 50 cards will be locked with no warning. People cannot be expected to fix decks which are 80 cards in size.
Find all posts by this user
03-17-2008, 07:31 PM
Post: #2
RE: The Rules
Can I post a deck using Atem's list if I make it clear that I am doing so?
Find all posts by this user
03-17-2008, 07:33 PM
Post: #3
RE: The Rules
Chaos Pudding Wrote:Can I post a deck using Atem's list if I make it clear that I am doing so?

Section edited to permit the Atem Penultimate Banlist, because it's awesome.
Find all posts by this user
03-17-2008, 07:37 PM (This post was last modified: 03-17-2008 07:37 PM by Chaos Pudding.)
Post: #4
RE: The Rules
Cool. Time to bust out some new decks...
Find all posts by this user
03-17-2008, 07:42 PM
Post: #5
RE: The Rules
whats the atem banlist?
Find all posts by this user
03-17-2008, 07:45 PM
Post: #6
RE: The Rules
DevilMayCry4Life Wrote:whats the atem banlist?

The Atem Penultimate Banlist, which is superior to the junk that Konami cooks up (Click to View)
Find all posts by this user
03-17-2008, 07:59 PM (This post was last modified: 03-17-2008 07:59 PM by b7hamma.)
Post: #7
RE: The Rules
Addendum A (aka The Xander Clause)

If you're going to use obscure or unreleased OCG cards, provide a link or c/p the effect in your post.
Find all posts by this user
03-17-2008, 08:13 PM
Post: #8
RE: The Rules
b7hamma Wrote:Addendum A (aka The Xander Clause)

If you're going to use obscure or unreleased OCG cards, provide a link or c/p the effect in your post.

I agree. Added.
Find all posts by this user
03-22-2008, 12:49 PM
Post: #9
Shy RE: The Rules
ok man
Find all posts by this user
03-22-2008, 01:16 PM
Post: #10
RE: The Rules
jtdog97 Wrote:ok man

This post will trigger a new Renaissance, complete with art, music, and noses made of solid gold.
Find all posts by this user
03-22-2008, 02:16 PM
Post: #11
RE: The Rules
Wow. Not many people follow the rules. >.>
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
03-29-2008, 04:49 PM
Post: #12
RE: The Rules
kizzi Wrote:Wow. Not many people follow the rules. >.>

That's the problem with stickies in general. The people who need to read them are the people who don't.
Find all posts by this user
04-28-2008, 05:55 PM
Post: #13
RE: The Rules
I believe we need a new rule.

If you post your deck on this board, you will accept that people WILL tell you that your deck sucks, among other comments, and that those same people will tell you to change cards in said deck. If you cannot deal, then do not post your deck. If you post your deck and then show that you cannot or will not accept constructive criticism, then your thread will be locked
Find all posts by this user
04-28-2008, 06:06 PM
Post: #14
RE: The Rules
The Jack Witt Clause has been added. The name was generated after I pressed random keys on my keyboard. Any resemblance to the names of actual users, living or dead, is purely coincidental.
Find all posts by this user
04-28-2008, 06:08 PM
Post: #15
RE: The Rules
Crab Helmet Wrote:The Jack Witt Clause has been added. The name was generated after I pressed random keys on my keyboard. Any resemblance to the names of actual users, living or dead, is purely coincidental.
*is clearing room to sig that*
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
05-31-2008, 07:22 PM (This post was last modified: 05-31-2008 07:24 PM by BlueThunder37.)
Post: #16
RE: The Rules
Crab Helmet Wrote:
jtdog97 Wrote:ok man

This post will trigger a new Renaissance, complete with art, music, and noses made of solid gold.

......Huh?? lol that's funny. People that posts pointless decks should really read this.
Find all posts by this user
06-30-2008, 08:18 PM (This post was last modified: 06-30-2008 08:30 PM by Destructor.)
Post: #17
RE: The Rules
Is there a limit to cards in a deck posting

you know the kind where there is certain amount of cards that are allowed to be posted as a deck recipe
Find all posts by this user
07-01-2008, 04:37 AM
Post: #18
RE: The Rules
Not at the moment but it is in the process of becoming a rule
Find all posts by this user
07-14-2008, 12:30 AM
Post: #19
RE: The Rules
iv got only one question: i want to post my deck, but it has 57 cards, but i want to post it asking what 7 cards to take out.. is that legal??
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
07-14-2008, 12:37 AM
Post: #20
RE: The Rules
Considering JoC edited that rule in, not Crab, I personally don't take it into account, mainly because IIRC there's already a limit to the deck size, 60 cards.
Find all posts by this user
Thread Closed 


Forum Jump: