Threaded Mode | Linear Mode

CardTimeNow · 10-17-2008, 04:40 PM

I stand by it. And please try to refrain from posting such huge images.

**Crab Helmet** · 10-17-2008, 08:20 PM

(10-17-2008 04:40 PM)CardTimeNow Wrote: I stand by it.

The strength of your well-reasoned argument compels me. I wholeheartedly agree with you now.

(10-17-2008 04:40 PM)CardTimeNow Wrote: And please try to refrain from posting such huge images.

Your suggestion has been duly noted.

CardTimeNow · 10-18-2008, 10:26 PM

No need to be sarcastic. I'm not, nor do I intend to convince you to think the same thing.

**Crab Helmet** · 10-18-2008, 10:29 PM

(10-18-2008 10:26 PM)CardTimeNow Wrote: No need to be sarcastic. I'm not, nor do I intend to convince you to think the same thing.

Then stop posting.

Dark Phoenix · 10-18-2008, 10:31 PM

(10-18-2008 10:29 PM)Crab Helmet Wrote:
(10-18-2008 10:26 PM)CardTimeNow Wrote: No need to be sarcastic. I'm not, nor do I intend to convince you to think the same thing.

Then stop posting.

Damn it Crab. I don't have room in my sig for all your epic posts. STOP IT. >.<

~Xemnas

CardTimeNow · 10-18-2008, 10:54 PM

I posting once stating my opinion, then just responded to your posts.

The Dark One · 10-21-2008, 10:06 PM

"That is completely untrue" are the words that you posted. That phrase is not a statement of opinion, but rather an incorrect fact. In other words, you are irrevocably and irreconcilably wrong.

Also, by posting, you are giving us the implied right to critique your post. In fact, you cannot take that right from us, except through dormancy. (sentences using big words for dummies: You did not give an opinion. You are wrong, and further argument will make you look like a fool. If you post, we laugh. If you don't want us to laugh, then don't post.)

Pardon my apparently maliciously intended post. For, while my claims against you are true, not everyone is necessarily going to be a good player or a respected person when it comes to cards, and your apparent lack of those attributes does not preclude you from: A. Being a perfectly good/intelligent/nice/useful/important/etc. person in other areas of life or B. Becoming a skilled player/respected authority on cards in the future. And we enjoy poking at people who say foolish things, it is important to remember the reason for which we are poking at said foolish people: FUN. No harm is truly meant to come down on you. In fact, if anything, you should be glad of this sort of treatment, because it encourages you to improve in order to escape the laughter.

~~sbdnate~~ · 10-26-2008, 12:09 AM

very nice^

eliteduelists · 12-02-2008, 10:26 PM

are the deck building contest rules in here the same as in the contest section of the forum

mikester3 · 12-03-2008, 09:27 PM

i can probobly make a 50 card deck with 3 synchros and 10 fusions.

Tabris · 12-04-2008, 03:22 AM

Wait. I'll ask this:

What if a particular deck has 50+ cards, yet seems reasonably built?

Would you allow its existence for rumination by fellow forumgoers?

**Crab Helmet** · 12-04-2008, 06:35 PM

(12-04-2008 03:22 AM)Tabris Wrote: Wait. I'll ask this:

What if a particular deck has 50+ cards, yet seems reasonably built?

Would you allow its existence for rumination by fellow forumgoers?

In the event that such a deck were to exist, it would be permitted. However, since such a deck has never been created, and rookies are constantly posting terrible 60-card decks, this rule is an excellent guideline for the infinitely vast majority of all cases.

luffy789 · 02-01-2009, 04:28 AM

(08-18-2008 04:04 PM)MacroMonarch12 Wrote:
(07-02-2008 01:05 PM)luffy789 Wrote: so what about decks with 60 cards? are you locking them to?

-_- isnt 60 bigger than 50

that was along time ago genius.

anyway this rule isn't to bad but couldn't u post a seperate thread for decks with 50 or more cards in them? i would like that. and i am sure that the beginners would like it to. that way the beginners will get better and better until their was no need for decks 50+ cards. just a friendly suggestion.

Judgment Dragon · (This post was last modified: 02-01-2009 06:31 AM by Judgment Dragon.)

(02-01-2009 04:28 AM)luffy789 Wrote:
(08-18-2008 04:04 PM)MacroMonarch12 Wrote:
(07-02-2008 01:05 PM)luffy789 Wrote: so what about decks with 60 cards? are you locking them to?

-_- isnt 60 bigger than 50

that was along time ago genius.

anyway this rule isn't to bad but couldn't u post a seperate thread for decks with 50 or more cards in them? i would like that. and i am sure that the beginners would like it to. that way the beginners will get better and better until their was no need for decks 50+ cards. just a friendly suggestion.

The decision regarding that suggestion isn't up to the local Moderator. As much as I see no point to it, a suggestion like that belongs in Comments & Suggestions.

dj_syko · 02-04-2009, 06:27 PM

what about if you have 51 cards?

Judgment Dragon · 02-04-2009, 09:17 PM

Then it would be locked. Still, you shouldn't even be running 50 Cards in a Deck. 40 - 45 is the acceptable range even though I still think 45 is too much.

Switchblade1 · 02-05-2009, 06:18 PM

This stops me from getting help on my 60 card anti-attack deck which has won 3 tournaments against some of the top players in the US. I beleive that this is an outdated rule that needs to be updated to allow 60 card decks. who cares if people post more than 50 cards in their deck, it should be thier choice not some overzellous mod who feels the need to enforce a rule that goes against the rules of the game itself. Also i am proof that someone can use a large deck skillfully and not be a bad player. Calling someone a bad player cause they use more cards in their deck than most others, is a matter of opinion and could be considered insulting. in other words "50+ cards =/= Bad Player".

**JesusofChaos™** · 02-06-2009, 04:15 AM

(02-05-2009 06:18 PM)Switchblade1 Wrote: This stops me from getting help on my 60 card anti-attack deck which has won 3 tournaments against some of the top players in the US. I beleive that this is an outdated rule that needs to be updated to allow 60 card decks. who cares if people post more than 50 cards in their deck, it should be thier choice not some overzellous mod who feels the need to enforce a rule that goes against the rules of the game itself. Also i am proof that someone can use a large deck skillfully and not be a bad player. Calling someone a bad player cause they use more cards in their deck than most others, is a matter of opinion and could be considered insulting. in other words "50+ cards =/= Bad Player".

Installing a new rule- 10 minutes
Telling noobs to get a life- 5 minutes

Reading a lulz filled post- Priceless

There are some things in life that are unfunny for everything else there is YCM

Judgment Dragon · (This post was last modified: 02-06-2009 04:38 AM by Judgment Dragon.)

(02-05-2009 06:18 PM)Switchblade1 Wrote: This stops me from getting help on my 60 card anti-attack deck which has won 3 tournaments against some of the top players in the US.

That's because the opponents you duel are terrible players like you.

(02-05-2009 06:18 PM)Switchblade1 Wrote: I beleive that this is an outdated rule that needs to be updated to allow 60 card decks. who cares if people post more than 50 cards in their deck

Good players who attempt to fix Decks care. Why the hell should I waste my valuable time that could be better spent having a life to fix someone's horrible excuse for a Deck.

(02-05-2009 06:18 PM)Switchblade1 Wrote: it should be thier choice not some overzellous mod who feels the need to enforce a rule that goes against the rules of the game itself.

It is by no means against the rules of the game. No one who is good at the game can be expected to fix a 50+ Card Deck. Our Moderator here is one of the best players on the entire Site. Questioning him as well as any good player on this site is a bad move on your part.

(02-05-2009 06:18 PM)Switchblade1 Wrote: Also i am proof that someone can use a large deck skillfully and not be a bad player. Calling someone a bad player cause they use more cards in their deck than most others, is a matter of opinion and could be considered insulting. in other words "50+ cards =/= Bad Player".

The fact of the matter is that you are a bad player if you use more than 45 Cards in a Deck. It may seem good to have more options but as a matter of fact, you have a terribly inconsistent Deck that holds you back from drawing much needed stuff. I even think 45 is too much but Decks like Stall and Gadgets actually have good reason to run 45 Cards in a Deck.

tl;dr version:

(02-06-2009 04:15 AM)JesusofChaos™ Wrote:
(02-05-2009 06:18 PM)Switchblade1 Wrote: This stops me from getting help on my 60 card anti-attack deck which has won 3 tournaments against some of the top players in the US. I beleive that this is an outdated rule that needs to be updated to allow 60 card decks. who cares if people post more than 50 cards in their deck, it should be thier choice not some overzellous mod who feels the need to enforce a rule that goes against the rules of the game itself. Also i am proof that someone can use a large deck skillfully and not be a bad player. Calling someone a bad player cause they use more cards in their deck than most others, is a matter of opinion and could be considered insulting. in other words "50+ cards =/= Bad Player".

Installing a new rule- 10 minutes
Telling noobs to get a life- 5 minutes

Reading a lulz filled post- Priceless

There are some things in life that are unfunny for everything else there is YCM

That.

**Crab Helmet** · 02-06-2009, 04:59 AM

Guys, it's an account with one post that does a ridiculously exaggerated version of the rook argument against Rule 50 with obvious fabrications. Don't the two of you think it might just possibly perhaps be a joke account rather than a serious post?