|
Ok, Seriously, I Might Be High [Updated]
|
|
11-09-2008, 02:22 PM
(This post was last modified: 11-14-2008 10:00 PM by Tekken Ham.)
Post: #1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ok, Seriously, I Might Be High [Updated]
Post Dark Legends
Monsters[19]: 3x Destiny Hero-Dasher 1x Gorz 1x Stratos 3x Magical Exemplar 2x Kycoo 3x Night's End Sorcerer 1x Skilled Dark Magician 2x Destiny Hero-Diamond Dude 1x Sangan 1x Breaker 1x Destiny Hero-Fear Monger Spells[19]: 3x Secret Village of Spellcasters 3x D-Draw 1x Heavy 1x Reborn 1x MST 1x Trunade 2x Foolish Burial 1x Card Destruction 3x Magical Dimension 1x Brain Control 1x RoTA 1x Terraforming Traps[2]: 2x Solemn Extra[14]: 2x Stardust 2x Goyo 2x Colossal 2x Tempest 2x Psychic Lifetrancer 2x Magical Android 1x RDA 1x Gyzarus So yeah, I needed an excuse to put the DHERO Engine that we're getting from Dark Legends into casters. Basically, D-Draws give hand advantage which turns into spell counters, by way of Tempest. Dashers are plain smexy since I don't need Malis. Exemplers recur Night's End frequently. So, go crazy on this, it's a rough draft. Just no stupid suggestions and back up your suggestions with a reason or two. EDIT: Update, Marionette is a dead draw most of the time, so I edged him out. Magical Dimension is just plain sexy, so yeah, edits made |
|||
|
11-09-2008, 03:02 PM
Post: #2
|
|||
|
|||
| RE: Ok, Seriously, I Might Be High | |||
|
11-09-2008, 05:36 PM
Post: #3
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Ok, Seriously, I Might Be High
if you want some speed, then use 3 plasma, 3 dogma, 3 d draw, 3 trade in and 3 allure. And personally i'd neg solemns for PWWB. That may sound crazy, but 2 solemns puts you down to 2k. and a tele-dad or any deck worth its salt can deal that in 1 turn.
|
|||
|
11-09-2008, 08:58 PM
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Ok, Seriously, I Might Be High
(11-09-2008 05:36 PM)basariosvolcanis Wrote: if you want some speed, then use 3 plasma, 3 dogma, 3 d draw, 3 trade in and 3 allure. And personally i'd neg solemns for PWWB. That may sound crazy, but 2 solemns puts you down to 2k. and a tele-dad or any deck worth its salt can deal that in 1 turn.Because I'm definitely gonna dedicate 15 cards for draw power that belongs in turbo Exodia, especially when I only have 6 targets for 6 draw cards, and those six targets are useless outside of draw fodder. That engine belongs in Exodia, not in Casters. Also, I'm definitely going to use both Solemns EVERY game on negating stuff that won't save my life. Sure Solemn is being sorta outphased, but it's still as good a card as ever, and especially when I need to negate traps. |
|||
|
11-09-2008, 09:03 PM
Post: #5
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Ok, Seriously, I Might Be High
Why are you running skilled dark magicians?
|
|||
|
11-09-2008, 09:05 PM
Post: #6
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Ok, Seriously, I Might Be High
The same reason Andal was considered good tech when GB's were dominating the meta. Also the same reason Andal was run at worlds. Also because Tele-DaD can't normal summon anything over it and it keeps field presence for Village.
|
|||
|
11-09-2008, 09:15 PM
Post: #7
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Ok, Seriously, I Might Be High
I dont really like Fear monger in here. Try adding another diamond dude.
Well, I dont really know cause it is good at reusing dashers effect. It depends on your liking. |
|||
|
11-10-2008, 07:15 PM
Post: #8
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Ok, Seriously, I Might Be High
Fear Monger is personal preference because I like recurring Dasher, and there isn't a huge dependence on Diamond Dude's effect, it's more of an, "Oh s***, I can do this!" just like DaD in Tele-DaD. Except not gamebreaking.
|
|||
|
11-11-2008, 03:00 AM
Post: #9
|
|||
|
|||
| RE: Ok, Seriously, I Might Be High | |||
|
11-12-2008, 12:55 AM
Post: #10
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Ok, Seriously, I Might Be High
maybe Dark Red Enchanters for hand control?
|
|||
|
11-12-2008, 05:41 AM
Post: #11
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Ok, Seriously, I Might Be High
i think if your goign to use d heros use 3 didamond dude but thn i guess thts just me
and liek i said on the mudkipz thread i liek the apprentice engine... |
|||
|
11-12-2008, 07:28 AM
Post: #12
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Ok, Seriously, I Might Be High
The Apprentice Engine would be nice, but the best target would be Crystal Seer, and that's not the greatest, sure it would help alot in this deck, but the D-Draw Engine picks up that slack. Also, there is a lack of good targets for DDude, since dropping a Village to the bottom will cripple this deck.
And Hand Control isn't good this format. Everyone wants cards in the graveyard. Sure you could hit a good target, but with all the recursion and the speed of LS/Tele-DaD, I don't think it'll make a difference. And Zombies will just laugh and thank you. |
|||
|
11-12-2008, 03:23 PM
Post: #13
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Ok, Seriously, I Might Be High
true. Maybe add some DD Crows?
|
|||
|
11-12-2008, 04:02 PM
Post: #14
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Ok, Seriously, I Might Be High
Night's End Sorcerer>Crow.
|
|||
|
11-12-2008, 04:04 PM
Post: #15
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Ok, Seriously, I Might Be High
reason Im sayin add Crow is cause Crow can be used on opponents turn in chain to something like Reborn or it can hit a malicious in chain to D-Draw (Not quite sure if opponent can chain with Malicious or not)
|
|||
|
11-12-2008, 04:53 PM
Post: #16
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Ok, Seriously, I Might Be High
(11-12-2008 04:04 PM)Tickle Me Emo Wrote: reason Im sayin add Crow is cause Crow can be used on opponents turn in chain to something like Reborn or it can hit a malicious in chain to D-Draw (Not quite sure if opponent can chain with Malicious or not) he doesn't need crow, night will do the job fine, if premeptively on must stuff. mal is not a real big threat. village remember? if you have room in your extra deck, thow in arcinite magician, he is the new spell counter DaD. |
|||
|
11-12-2008, 05:29 PM
Post: #17
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Ok, Seriously, I Might Be High
(11-12-2008 04:53 PM)werewolfjedi Wrote:I didn't know Arcanite came out in the TCG yet.(11-12-2008 04:04 PM)Tickle Me Emo Wrote: reason Im sayin add Crow is cause Crow can be used on opponents turn in chain to something like Reborn or it can hit a malicious in chain to D-Draw (Not quite sure if opponent can chain with Malicious or not) |
|||
|
11-14-2008, 10:00 PM
Post: #18
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Ok, Seriously, I Might Be High
Bump
|
|||
|
11-15-2008, 01:55 AM
Post: #19
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Ok, Seriously, I Might Be High [Updated]
you took out marionette?
|
|||
|
11-15-2008, 10:02 AM
Post: #20
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Ok, Seriously, I Might Be High [Updated]
It's a dead draw most of the time and when it does hit the field I never get it's effect off.
|
|||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|

Card Maker
Search
Member List
Calendar
Help






