Jump to content

Photo

[Xyz] Anti-Xyz Xyz Monster?!

- - - - - Xyz Dark Xyz Thunder Anti-Meta Anti-Xyz

  • Please log in to reply
46 replies to this topic

#1
Quiksilver

Quiksilver

    Look within.

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 965 posts

A Xyz Monster that works to stop Xyzs? Impossible!

Posted Image

{Going to be the new) Lore: 2 Level 3 Monsters
This card gains 200 ATK for every Xyz Material attached to this card. Once per turn, you can detach 1 Xyz Material from this card; select 1 face-up Xyz monster: detach all Xyz Materials attached to that card. If there are no Xyz Material attached to the selected monster when you activate this effect; destroy the selected card.

So, hate/rate/raeg. The works.



#2
Zanda Panda

Zanda Panda

    Legendary Member

  • Senior Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,199 posts
Eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeh, the Summoning requirement kills it. :/ The effect itself is pretty decent.

Posted Image

Thanks to Catman for this siggy.


#3
Glogatha

Glogatha

    The content below maybe inappropriate for all ages

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 576 posts
wicked pic, plus you could use a Great Xyz effect(I think...)
I like it, since it has uses...
Posted Image

My Friend is Sick! :( tell her to get well! go to said link and leave a comment! <3 http://forum.yugiohc...renity-manning/

quotes

FAN GIFTS

#4
old rod account

old rod account

    ~We are the dream shooters~

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,673 posts
Very very slow.

Make it 2x Level 3 and it'll be better

#5
Black

Black

    Don't lose your way

  • Senior Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 40,531 posts
This can be run over like nothing, so 2 materials is really the only way to go.

Furthermore, anti-effects like this are, generally, bad. Orient Dragon is good, but that's due to how it activates, what it hits, and what it is replacing.

Shiny

#6
Quiksilver

Quiksilver

    Look within.

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 965 posts

Very very slow.

Make it 2x Level 3 and it'll be better


Eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeh, the Summoning requirement kills it. :/ The effect itself is pretty decent.


I made it x3 mainly because I hate Rescue Rabbit. But, since I have no doubt it'll get banned soon, I'll try and change it.

wicked pic, plus you could use a Great Xyz effect(I think...)
I like it, since it has uses...


Thanks...? I don't know what you mean with the great Xyz effect part, but anyways...

This can be run over like nothing, so 2 materials is really the only way to go.

Furthermore, anti-effects like this are, generally, bad. Orient Dragon is good, but that's due to how it activates, what it hits, and what it is replacing.


True to the first part.

For the second part, nearly all Xyz effects require you to detach Xyz Materials, and some, like Evolkaiser Ragia, require a specific amount, so using this card could really mess up your opponent's plans. That's how I see it, anyways.

hanks for the comments, guys.

#7
Zanda Panda

Zanda Panda

    Legendary Member

  • Senior Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,199 posts
Well, there's nothing more to discuss here, because OP deliberately made his card bad because of 1 card.

Posted Image

Thanks to Catman for this siggy.


#8
Glogatha

Glogatha

    The content below maybe inappropriate for all ages

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 576 posts
I ment you could use a great effect twice. (I forgot the last word O.O)
Posted Image

My Friend is Sick! :( tell her to get well! go to said link and leave a comment! <3 http://forum.yugiohc...renity-manning/

quotes

FAN GIFTS

#9
Quiksilver

Quiksilver

    Look within.

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 965 posts

Well, there's nothing more to discuss here, because OP deliberately made his card bad because of 1 card.


Not the only reason, my friend. I also did it because most cards require two Xyz Materials and you would need 3 Xyz Materials if you really wanted to destroy that card.

#10
Black

Black

    Don't lose your way

  • Senior Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 40,531 posts
If you think Rabbit is going to be banned, what does it matter if it's abusable with rabbit?

Shiny

#11
Zanda Panda

Zanda Panda

    Legendary Member

  • Senior Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,199 posts

Not the only reason, my friend. I also did it because most cards require two Xyz Materials and you would need 3 Xyz Materials if you really wanted to destroy that card.


If you're going to make Anti-Meta, make it good. Do not make it make you waste more resources than your opponent.

Posted Image

Thanks to Catman for this siggy.


#12
Ieyasu Tokugawa

Ieyasu Tokugawa

    Legendary Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,560 posts
Make it a Kuribolt-eske effect that detaches all materials on the monster or destroys it.

And lol @ rabbit being banned. It's not THAT abusable.

#13
Quiksilver

Quiksilver

    Look within.

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 965 posts

If you think Rabbit is going to be banned, what does it matter if it's abusable with rabbit?


Because, if it was inserted into the game the time I made it, I would want it to be fair and balanced that exact moment, you know? I didn't want to say "oh but this will be balanced by the time the banlist comes around". I want it to be a realistic card this format.

I know, this conflicts with what I said before, but that was a concession on my part, so I'm sorry about that.

If you're going to make Anti-Meta, make it good. Do not make it make you waste more resources than your opponent.


Good tip.

In the end, however, would it? If you managed to pull off that play, you'd both be down three monsters, and one of your opponent's would be an Xyz Monster, so...?

Make it a Kuribolt-eske effect that detaches all materials on the monster or destroys it.

And lol @ rabbit being banned. It's not THAT abusable.


That doesn't sound like that bad of an idea. Thank you.

When it's in a deck based around it, Level 4 Normal Monsters, and Return from a Different Dimension, oh it is.

...Maybe Limited.

#14
Ieyasu Tokugawa

Ieyasu Tokugawa

    Legendary Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,560 posts

When it's in a deck based around it, Level 4 Normal Monsters, and Return from a Different Dimension, oh it is.

Played it. Only good way to revive it is with Leviair, and even then you only get Rabbit's effect once per turn, no matter how many times you revive it. it's only 1 Xyz by itself.

#15
Black

Black

    Don't lose your way

  • Senior Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 40,531 posts

Because, if it was inserted into the game the time I made it, I would want it to be fair and balanced that exact moment, you know? I didn't want to say "oh but this will be balanced by the time the banlist comes around". I want it to be a realistic card this format.

I know, this conflicts with what I said before, but that was a concession on my part, so I'm sorry about that.

This card is not balanced, and never will be. It's terrible. It's not fair, it makes you lose resources. It's not very realistic, except in the LOLnami sense.

Shiny

#16
Ieyasu Tokugawa

Ieyasu Tokugawa

    Legendary Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,560 posts

This card is not balanced, and never will be. It's terrible. It's not fair, it makes you lose resources. It's not very realistic, except in the LOLnami sense.

I kinda liked my idea though...

#17
Black

Black

    Don't lose your way

  • Senior Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 40,531 posts

I kinda liked my idea though...

Your idea would make it. But, as he has it, no, it's not.

Shiny

#18
Koko the Buster

Koko the Buster

    Black Widow

  • Senior Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,901 posts

This card is not balanced, and never will be. It's terrible. It's not fair, it makes you lose resources. It's not very realistic, except in the LOLnami sense.


Next time, at least try to provide something useful to the topic. That post can be treated as spamming simply because you provided little to no contribution for the topic creator to get better.

Anyway, I'd expand off of Miror B's idea by also making the Xyz gain ATK equal to the number of it's Materials you removed, so that way it can actually defend itself a bit better as well. Other than that, nice idea, but poor execution.

iVhwSGqeXuh2o.gif


#19
Quiksilver

Quiksilver

    Look within.

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 965 posts

This card is not balanced, and never will be. It's terrible. It's not fair, it makes you lose resources. It's not very realistic, except in the LOLnami sense.


Look, I'm not trying to piss you off. I don't know what is I've done to make you mad, but I'm sorry. Thank you for pointing out my card's flaws, and I'll do my best to address them. "It's terrible" doesn't really help much, however. Any specific reasons it's bad?


Next time, at least try to provide something useful to the topic. That post can be treated as spamming simply because you provided little to no contribution for the topic creator to get better.

Anyway, I'd expand off of Miror B's idea by also making the Xyz gain ATK equal to the number of it's Tokens you control, so that way it can actually defend itself a bit better as well. Other than that, nice idea, but poor execution.


I assume you mean Xyz Material? That is a nice idea, and thank you for your comment.

#20
Icy

Icy

    Good men need not rules. Hesitate for why we have so many.

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,768 posts

Your idea would make it. But, as he has it, no, it's not.


And yet he is still sitting here, trying to understand his card as well as what makes it unbalanced and all the little things in between. Properly discussing it with members, and learning as he goes along, asking the right questions with minimal arrogance. Yet you sit here and you state almost entirely negative views that impede his progress despite doing everything RIGHT. Warned for quite literally harassing members.

Keep up the good work Quiksilver, as is you're admirable yet regardless of what this card's balance etc may be.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users