Jump to content

Photo

-- The Most Ridiculously Overpowered Xyz --[Divine Retributor Setekh: Judge of the Fallen]

* - - - - 1 votes comment and rate

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
54 replies to this topic

#41
Gandorator

Gandorator

    <<<Canned Peace>>>

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,542 posts

Advanced Ritual Art sending 2 Vanilla HEROes for Reshef. Take control of random Level 8 Synchro with Reshef. Miracle Fusion omni-HERO. Summon this. Win.

And even then it's horrible.


weeeell I don't know about any of you with your "advanced yu-gi-oh knowledge" but I would sure as hell be satisfied if I pulled off that combo. The summoning of this card itself is fun.
And you all should realize that this is the point of this card.

Its effect is pretty much an instant win. So? Deal with it.
What? There aren't any instant-win cards in YGO?..

Shooting Quasar/ Exodia / Exodius / Final Countdown/ Vennominaga the Deity of Poisonous Snakes/ Last turn say hi.

#42
LinkTheGHhero14

LinkTheGHhero14

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 29 posts

Eh, just because Konami makes worthless, ridiculous boss cards doesn't mean we have to.

We're doing it as a theoretical way of helping the game.

Konami is a business.

On that note, Obelisk the Tormentor's better simply because it's nearly as good as this but much easier to get out.


*snicker* That's what she said! But seriously, I'd like to point out that this is only a theoretical card. It doesn't exist and most likely won't exist ever.
________________________________

I just summoned three Blue Eyes in one

turn! Whatcha gonna do about it?

#43
Ieyasu Tokugawa

Ieyasu Tokugawa

    Legendary Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,560 posts
All are so much easier to use than this and have outs.

#44
Guest_Cursed Reaction_*

Guest_Cursed Reaction_*
  • Guests
I've realised what this card basically is:

HERP DERP
[Effect Monster]
[0 ATK/0 DEF]
This card cannot be Summoned or used in a Duel. When this card is Summoned: You Win the Duel.

:/

The other insta-win cards are at least half usable (except perhaps Venominaga). This unfortunately isn't.

#45
LinkTheGHhero14

LinkTheGHhero14

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 29 posts

I've realised what this card basically is:

HERP DERP
[Effect Monster]
[0 ATK/0 DEF]
This card cannot be Summoned or used in a Duel. When this card is Summoned: You Win the Duel.

:/

The other insta-win cards are at least half usable (except perhaps Venominaga). This unfortunately isn't.


But it's puuuuurty :3
________________________________

I just summoned three Blue Eyes in one

turn! Whatcha gonna do about it?

#46
Gandorator

Gandorator

    <<<Canned Peace>>>

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,542 posts

Eh, just because Konami makes worthless, ridiculous boss cards doesn't mean we have to.

We're doing it as a theoretical way of helping the game.

Konami is a business.

On that note, Obelisk the Tormentor's better simply because it's nearly as good as this but much easier to get out.


> it doesn't mean we don't have to either...
this isn't a case of "having to" anyways.

>> We are not doing it to help the game, or at least I'm not. I'm doing it for fun. I'm doing it because I'm bored. I'm doing it because I like it.
Besides, you can't help the game in any way, no one on YCM will have their cards made into real ones. (well I guess that's why you said theoretical)

>>> Konami....why did we start talking about Konami again?

#47
Guest_Tristan T. Taylor_*

Guest_Tristan T. Taylor_*
  • Guests

So, if you don't want any criticism or correction of your card, why did you bother posting it here in the first place?



#48
Gandorator

Gandorator

    <<<Canned Peace>>>

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,542 posts

I've realised what this card basically is:

HERP DERP
[Effect Monster]
[0 ATK/0 DEF]
This card cannot be Summoned or used in a Duel. When this card is Summoned: You Win the Duel.

:/

The other insta-win cards are at least half usable (except perhaps Venominaga). This unfortunately isn't.


Posted Image



besides, this card isn't like that.
If you're not willing to read all previous comments, it's not my problem.

#49
LinkTheGHhero14

LinkTheGHhero14

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 29 posts

So, if you don't want any criticism or correction of your card, why did you bother posting it here in the first place?


Did he say he didn't want criticism? I must have missed that one.


________________________________

I just summoned three Blue Eyes in one

turn! Whatcha gonna do about it?

#50
Karkuk

Karkuk

    Former Moderator, still a twat.

  • Senior Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,883 posts
Wording/Grammar = 8/10
Creativity = 11/20
Balance = 4/30
Viability = 1/40

24% = F

Congratulations. You made something completely useless.

OCG is fine, you only drop marks for the capitalization error in the second sentence ("Summon", not "summon"). In terms of Creativity, one is reasonably happy with your concepts. A ridiculously broken card that is impossible to summon is rarely seen in Realistic (except when the fortnightly crop of noob threads occur), so one supposes one can hardly call you "unoriginal". Balance and Viability happen to go hand-in-hand for this kind of thing - put simply, the card is almost impossible to summon and if summoned (which one guarantees it will never be if you are playing even against another casual) it wins you the game. Cards like these are bad for the game. Drum that little mantra into your head - it's one of those important ones. You have the rare distinction of receiving the lowest marks ever in both the Balance and Viability sections...one thinks you know why.

Mildly put, you posted this in Realistic Cards and got a realistic review. This would be fine in AoC (one will happily move it there if you PM me), but you should never post stuff like this in Realistic. Ever. You made a mistake by posting this in RC. Go to AoC and post stuff like this there. When one looks at the arguments made in the second post - Gandorator understands that this card is intended to be fun. But it should not be in RC, simple as that.

And to the rest of you, stop arguing about it, we get the point now. And to LinktheGHhero14, I like you.

#51
Gandorator

Gandorator

    <<<Canned Peace>>>

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,542 posts

So, if you don't want any criticism or correction of your card, why did you bother posting it here in the first place?


1. No one ever suggested corrections on my card if I'm not mistaken
2. I posted it so I can share it with people since I believe it's original.
3. I never said I don't want criticism, HOWEVER, I want criticism that I cannot disprove.
4. most of the people here are arguing about completely different things



#52
Guest_Tristan T. Taylor_*

Guest_Tristan T. Taylor_*
  • Guests

1. No one ever suggested corrections on my card if I'm not mistaken
2. I posted it so I can share it with people since I believe it's original.
3. I never said I don't want criticism, HOWEVER, I want criticism that I cannot disprove.
4. most of the people here are arguing about completely different things[/indent]

Look up.

#53
Gandorator

Gandorator

    <<<Canned Peace>>>

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,542 posts

Look up.


WOW, NO WAY!! I would've so missed that comment if it wasn't for you buddy, I owe you one...
phew!... and to believe if it wasn't for you, I would've missed it...that was close...

Wording/Grammar = 8/10
Creativity = 11/20
Balance = 4/30
Viability = 1/40

24% = F

Congratulations. You made something completely useless.

OCG is fine, you only drop marks for the capitalization error in the second sentence ("Summon", not "summon"). In terms of Creativity, one is reasonably happy with your concepts. A ridiculously broken card that is impossible to summon is rarely seen in Realistic (except when the fortnightly crop of noob threads occur), so one supposes one can hardly call you "unoriginal". Balance and Viability happen to go hand-in-hand for this kind of thing - put simply, the card is almost impossible to summon and if summoned (which one guarantees it will never be if you are playing even against another casual) it wins you the game. Cards like these are bad for the game. Drum that little mantra into your head - it's one of those important ones. You have the rare distinction of receiving the lowest marks ever in both the Balance and Viability sections...one thinks you know why.

Mildly put, you posted this in Realistic Cards and got a realistic review. This would be fine in AoC (one will happily move it there if you PM me), but you should never post stuff like this in Realistic. Ever. You made a mistake by posting this in RC. Go to AoC and post stuff like this there. When one looks at the arguments made in the second post - Gandorator understands that this card is intended to be fun. But it should not be in RC, simple as that.

And to the rest of you, stop arguing about it, we get the point now. And to LinktheGHhero14, I like you.


Yeah. Well, maybe I'll post it in there too then.
BUT, what I fail to realize is, even though this card is strictly fun, and not competitive, why on earth would it not belong in realistic cards?
Fun cards are not allowed here?

Is "Realistic" cards a place to post cards that can only be used in the current meta?

nvm, too tired to argue any further, it's late where I live.

#54
GLaDiaTe

GLaDiaTe

    I bet you were expecting something here weren't you?

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 793 posts
Wow, you're right. That's probably one of the most OPed cards I've ever seen.

"Who the hell do you think I Am!?" -Kamina

 

Dueling Network: GLaDiaTe

Chaos Dragons

Mermail Abyss

Dark Paladdin

Gravekeeper's


#55
Guest_Icyblue_*

Guest_Icyblue_*
  • Guests

WOW, NO WAY!! I would've so missed that comment if it wasn't for you buddy, I owe you one...
phew!... and to believe if it wasn't for you, I would've missed it...that was close...


Yeah. Well, maybe I'll post it in there too then.
BUT, what I fail to realize is, even though this card is strictly fun, and not competitive, why on earth would it not belong in realistic cards?
Fun cards are not allowed here?

Is "Realistic" cards a place to post cards that can only be used in the current meta?

nvm, too tired to argue any further, it's late where I live.


This card was allowed here. Until your arguments were about it being "fun". All cards here are made under the assumption that they are fun. While you can use it as a preemptive measure so people scale your card appropriately, using it as a defense constitutes an AoC discussion as you got the review and replies expected of this section (with a little humor I might add). And then you actually have the nerve to actually consider it an argument? You're the only one arguing. Topic locked, and I'm going to keep a personal eye on your behavior from this point on.