Jump to content

Photo

Konami banned your Glow-up Bulb? Your Spore? ...

- - - - -
Started by Glorious Shardstrom, Feb 19 2012 08:10 PM

  • Please log in to reply
13 replies to this topic

#1
Glorious Shardstrom
Posted 19 February 2012 - 08:10 PM

Glorious Shardstrom

    The Scarlet Devil

  • Senior Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,033 posts

Posted Image


suck it, konami.


btw this is way less abusive than bulb because it's cost isn't benificial and it's not a Plant so it can't herpaderpa with Lonefire.


Again another weak deck.
You really need to ADD MORE MOSTERS your deck contains more spells and traps than monsters and that's the biggest mistake in your deck.You MUST HAVE MORE THAN 20 MONSTERS TO MAKE YOUR DECK MORE BALANCED.You will lose most of the time with that deck.I don't know why you make a deck with 26 spells and traps and you call it a deck?!
Again you need more than 20 monsters to make your deck MORE BALANCED.

#2
Fraxure
Posted 19 February 2012 - 08:20 PM

Fraxure

    GIMP Geek

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 891 posts
Instant effect could make synchrons with slightly higher levels way easier to summon if level diversity in extra deck is decent. But Spell sacrifice + once per duel makes the effect more balanced to be fair I don't think it would be on the banlist, but probably limited. That 100 DEF stat is going a bit OP'd though, don't cha think? ;D

Posted Image


My Ultrasonic Archetype

#3
Glorious Shardstrom
Posted 19 February 2012 - 08:24 PM

Glorious Shardstrom

    The Scarlet Devil

  • Senior Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,033 posts

That 100 DEF stat is going a bit OP'd though, don't cha think? ;D


...

....

what...

Again another weak deck.
You really need to ADD MORE MOSTERS your deck contains more spells and traps than monsters and that's the biggest mistake in your deck.You MUST HAVE MORE THAN 20 MONSTERS TO MAKE YOUR DECK MORE BALANCED.You will lose most of the time with that deck.I don't know why you make a deck with 26 spells and traps and you call it a deck?!
Again you need more than 20 monsters to make your deck MORE BALANCED.

#4
Ieyasu Tokugawa
Posted 19 February 2012 - 08:25 PM

Ieyasu Tokugawa

    Legendary Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,560 posts
200 DEF
Now
Should also make it +1 summon for maximum abuse without actually abusing it. This doesn't have a lonefire at least.

#5
Glorious Shardstrom
Posted 19 February 2012 - 08:27 PM

Glorious Shardstrom

    The Scarlet Devil

  • Senior Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,033 posts

200 DEF
Now
Should also make it +1 summon for maximum abuse without actually abusing it. This doesn't have a lonefire at least.


okay....

Again another weak deck.
You really need to ADD MORE MOSTERS your deck contains more spells and traps than monsters and that's the biggest mistake in your deck.You MUST HAVE MORE THAN 20 MONSTERS TO MAKE YOUR DECK MORE BALANCED.You will lose most of the time with that deck.I don't know why you make a deck with 26 spells and traps and you call it a deck?!
Again you need more than 20 monsters to make your deck MORE BALANCED.

#6
Devil's Advocate
Posted 19 February 2012 - 08:29 PM

Devil's Advocate

    Is there anyone who can keep up with the beautiful and smart me?

  • Senior Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,948 posts
Is there any real benefit to Banishing Spell cards? It should have a Summoner Monk effect, only by discarding it, and not Banishing it. Unless someone can explain to me why that would be bad...

You wish you were this smooth.


cooltext752653474.png

Random Tags

#7
Glorious Shardstrom
Posted 19 February 2012 - 08:31 PM

Glorious Shardstrom

    The Scarlet Devil

  • Senior Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,033 posts

Is there any real benefit to Banishing Spell cards? It should have a Summoner Monk effect, only by discarding it, and not Banishing it. Unless someone can explain to me why that would be bad...


idk, Just flavor.
It seemed sorta unique.

Again another weak deck.
You really need to ADD MORE MOSTERS your deck contains more spells and traps than monsters and that's the biggest mistake in your deck.You MUST HAVE MORE THAN 20 MONSTERS TO MAKE YOUR DECK MORE BALANCED.You will lose most of the time with that deck.I don't know why you make a deck with 26 spells and traps and you call it a deck?!
Again you need more than 20 monsters to make your deck MORE BALANCED.

#8
Fraxure
Posted 19 February 2012 - 08:56 PM

Fraxure

    GIMP Geek

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 891 posts

...

....

what...


My attempt at humour, good sir/madam.

Posted Image


My Ultrasonic Archetype

#9
DARKPLANT RISING
Posted 19 February 2012 - 09:01 PM

DARKPLANT RISING

    God's In His Heaven, All's Right With the World

  • Senior Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,094 posts
Change Banish to Reveal

NOW

=My Stickied Tutorials=
How to not be a Noob l Good places to find pics for your cards l How to build good decks

#10
Hatcher
Posted 19 February 2012 - 09:06 PM

Hatcher

    Amphoteric

  • Moderators
  • 10,163 posts

Is there any real benefit to Banishing Spell cards? It should have a Summoner Monk effect, only by discarding it, and not Banishing it. Unless someone can explain to me why that would be bad...

Who... cares?

Meh, DMoC for Terrible Format? Transmigration Prophecy? Really, why does it matter?

YCM, in a nutshell:

 

 

 
 
 
 

My lolfail Yu-Gi-Oh GX RP Site >_>

#11
guuu1234
Posted 19 February 2012 - 09:16 PM

guuu1234

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 668 posts
I would prefer reveal over banishing. Just because I would rather not permantely lose a spell card for a chance at a summon with this card :/ though that will only make this card stronger, and is my opinion on the matter

But the recent boost in the number of people commenting is really uplifting y'know. Sorry I have to tell the truth and just be blunt, spending hours (on an average timescale takes maybe twelve-sixteen hours, guesstimate) to plan a chapter, script the duel, write it all, check it and edit it and post it up with hyperlinks and everything... to for the longest time think you've only got five readers, it is disheartening. Sorry, but it just is. And now that more people have started reading or commenting and giving feedback; I don't mean just praise because that is lovely but also critisism and thoughts feedback over the last six or so chapters, or who are messaging me by other means than in this thread, it is really confidence boosting to see some many happy readers and does give me a bit more of a kick in the proverbials.




WhatI think when I hear something stupid. . .

#12
ragnarok1945
Posted 19 February 2012 - 10:34 PM

ragnarok1945

    Shadow of the Orichalcos

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 50,123 posts
that's it for just once per duel?

It's not an effective recycler in that since

you should have made it like 3 times per duel or something

Posted Image
Posted Image

#13
Ieyasu Tokugawa
Posted 19 February 2012 - 10:35 PM

Ieyasu Tokugawa

    Legendary Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,560 posts

that's it for just once per duel?

It's not an effective recycler in that since

you should have made it like 3 times per duel or something

Oh dear god why.

#14
DARKPLANT RISING
Posted 19 February 2012 - 10:44 PM

DARKPLANT RISING

    God's In His Heaven, All's Right With the World

  • Senior Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,094 posts

Oh dear god why.

Because rag, duh

=My Stickied Tutorials=
How to not be a Noob l Good places to find pics for your cards l How to build good decks
Back to Realistic Cards - Single Cards


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

  1. Yugioh Card Maker Forum
  2. → Custom Cards
  3. → Realistic Cards - Single Cards