27 replies to this topic

[Sergio Dark World General]

Friendly bumps. This contest can end with 1 measily vote, or be extended.

!v1 is so dam edead that only Chuck Norris could kill it more.

[Fraxure]

Paulo: The effect is stackable, therefor Overpowered, however I like the concept behind it. The choose a card from your deck concept is nice enough, and could help summon Synchros, but not with a high level of reliability.

E & C: The effect isn't optional, seems a bit UP. Have to sacrifice yourself for something that is only useful sometimes.


OP v UP

However, Paulo's effect is more interesting and seems as if more effort went into it, it may be ban/limit worthy, but I know which card I'd rather use.

I vote for Paulo Silva

[Sergio Dark World General]

I vote for Paulo Silva

Thanks,1-2

[Tormented]

Just for the record I NEVER do OCG corrections in 1v1's so If I say bad OCG don't expect me to fix it.

EC's Card

Negatives:

• Seems like you gave no effort with the card.
• 1900 ATK seems a little OP'd if your going to have an effect which heavily relies on the Monster destroying another Monster, then you could just Equip this card with anything and increase it's ATK giving you a great Advantage
• Although it doesn't matter the Image is overused
• Concept is pretty bland.

Postitives:

• Playable
• OCG is OK

Overall: 4/10



Paulo's Card

Negatives:

• A little OP'd
• The ATK seems a little low
• Effect is poorly worded, not too sure if you can use it's effect on it's self or not.
• PIC is Low quality.

Positives:

• Concept is quite nice.
• The card recycling ability is quite good
• OCG is alright

Overall: 5/10

My vote goes to Paulo, unfortunately EC's card Lacked any defining card making skills or anything which could show that he least knows what he is doing.

[Sergio Dark World General]

Just for the record I NEVER do OCG corrections in 1v1's so If I say bad OCG don't expect me to fix it.

EC's Card

Negatives:

• Seems like you gave no effort with the card.
• 1900 ATK seems a little OP'd if your going to have an effect which heavily relies on the Monster destroying another Monster, then you could just Equip this card with anything and increase it's ATK giving you a great Advantage
• Although it doesn't matter the Image is overused
• Concept is pretty bland.

Postitives:

• Playable
• OCG is OK

Overall: 4/10



Paulo's Card

Negatives:

• A little OP'd
• The ATK seems a little low
• Effect is poorly worded, not too sure if you can use it's effect on it's self or not.
• PIC is Low quality.

Positives:

• Concept is quite nice.
• The card recycling ability is quite good
• OCG is alright

Overall: 5/10

My vote goes to Paulo, unfortunately EC's card Lacked any defining card making skills or anything which could show that he least knows what he is doing.

Thanks , 2-2

[Sergio Dark World General]

Bump Norris

[Sorin Markov]

Just for the record I NEVER do OCG corrections in 1v1's so If I say bad OCG don't expect me to fix it.

EC's Card

Negatives:

• Seems like you gave no effort with the card.
• 1900 ATK seems a little OP'd if your going to have an effect which heavily relies on the Monster destroying another Monster, then you could just Equip this card with anything and increase it's ATK giving you a great Advantage
• Although it doesn't matter the Image is overused
• Concept is pretty bland.

Postitives:

• Playable
• OCG is OK

Overall: 4/10



Paulo's Card

Negatives:

• A little OP'd
• The ATK seems a little low
• Effect is poorly worded, not too sure if you can use it's effect on it's self or not.
• PIC is Low quality.

Positives:

• Concept is quite nice.
• The card recycling ability is quite good
• OCG is alright

Overall: 5/10

My vote goes to Paulo, unfortunately EC's card Lacked any defining card making skills or anything which could show that he least knows what he is doing.

Same thing what tormented said.

[Sergio Dark World General]

Same thing what tormented said.

Guess it was 3-2. i'll pm Emmotion and tell him.