41 replies to this topic

[El Majishan]

Discuss

I had a few games against them...no idea how to play them....but they are annoying though.

[Canadian]

Looks bad on paper, works very well in trials.

[El Majishan]

They seem to auto lose to Fissure/Macro though.

I might build them when they come out cuz I have a thing for "cute" decks.

[Excellus]

I honestly didn't think much about Madolches since most of the cards looked situational. After playing them, I could see that they can easily make some nice plays.

[El Majishan]

I honestly didn't think much about Madolches since most of the cards looked situational. After playing them, I could see that they can easily make some nice plays.

Do you have any links to decent builds? I want to try them out.

[Excellus]

Do you have any links to decent builds? I want to try them out.

Here is what my build looks like:



Still is a work in progress, but it functions well enough to be able to play semi-competitively.

[El Majishan]

I was thinking of a Horn variant with Cruffsant. Thanks for the blue print though

[Canadian]

They seem to auto lose to Fissure/Macro though.

And rivalry

[EmpoleMew]

Without a doubt, my favorite archetype in the game. Adorable monsters that can clear the opponent's field, and put 10,500 damage on the board. Having Ticket on the field turns Dark Hole, Torrential, and Compulsory into pluses. Puddingcess, although not really needed anymore, is a +1 every time it battles another monster, even if she loses.

And they're all named after dessert. What's not to love?

[mido9]

Here is what my build looks like:

DNpic

Still is a work in progress, but it functions well enough to be able to play semi-competitively.

I like cruffstant since it can get beefy atk and keep chateaus and stuff safe.

[Excellus]

I negged an Eatos and Compulsary for 2 Huge Revolution is Overs. Don't know if I should replace with Starlight Road instead...

[Alestaire]

Seems far too complicated for me to actually want to play.

[-Doodle]

I honestly didn't think much about Madolches since most of the cards looked situational. After playing them, I could see that they can easily make some nice plays.

The thing is, as situational they are, you just have the options to search whatever you need for that situation with ticket and magileine.
Also, they have the most annoying to spell yet appetizing names ever

[.Rai]

I'm still adamant on my opinion that Brionac/Tiaramiss is still the best way to play it. They're quite obviously a combo deck.

Weird control variants with Eatos are subpar, to be honest.

[iHop]

I prefer just getting Chateau out and then just winning with constant 2200/2100 floaters and 15-20ish backrows.

[.Rai]

I prefer just getting Chateau out and then just winning with constant 2200/2100 floaters and 15-20ish backrows.

That's pretty much the most common way you can expect to win with Madolches.

Just saying, Chateau is awful design.

[mido9]

I prefer just getting Chateau out and then just winning with constant 2200/2100 floaters and 15-20ish backrows.

That's like playing a really weird T.G. Stun deck that doesnt run out of monsters and has bigger beaters and random +4 plays.

[iHop]

That's like playing a really weird T.G. Stun deck that doesnt run out of monsters and has bigger beaters and random +4 plays.

That's what comes to my mind as the closest relative as well.

[Wildflame]

http://shriek.twoday...ries/110779837/

It begins.

[Panic Black]

http://shriek.twoday...ries/110779837/

It begins.

It's the OCG. Citing it is like citing Casual Tournaments, more often than not.

That said, they have a good deal of potential.

EDIT: the deck runs double summon .-.