I'm Unpopular, So I'll Jump The Shark [Toyo Single]

[宇佐見 蓮子@C94]

Now, this is a story all about how

My life got flipped-turned upside down
And I'd like to take a minute
Just sit right there

I'll tell you how I became the queen of a town called RC

 

In Yugico Cardmaker born and raised
Xyz cards was where I spent most of my days
Ratin' cards maxin' relaxin' all cool
And all postin' some wacky cards
When a couple of noobs who were up to no good
Started making shit in my neighborhood
I got in one little fight and my ego got worried
She said 'You're movin' with your auntie and uncle in YCM'

 

[spoiler=I jumped the shark. There.]

When this card is Normal Summoned:  Declare 1 Monster type; Reveal the top 2 cards of your deck. If one of the cards revealed is a monster with the same Type as the declared Type, Special Summon it and draw 1 card. If not: banish this card. Shuffle the rest of the cards picked up into the deck. 

[/spoiler]

 

if you want me to continue the rap just say so. maybe i'll finish it. 

[-Noel-]

nice card, it's remind me an multi-type upgraded version of Witch of the Black Rose, good effect, good stat and of course, good pic :lol:

[Maeriberii Haan]

My gripe is that it won't trigger if you reveal 2.

 

That might need a fix.

[宇佐見 蓮子@C94]

I actually did that on purpose, so the card is more risky and less broken. It's not like I did it because I can't word it properly...

[Kitsuneko]

You shouldn't interchange one and 1 in the card text; consistency is good.

 

Similar principle to writing papers.

 

You really should change it to: "If at least 1 of the cards revealed..." I think it's far too weak and gimmicky otherwise. Even as is, it's a pretty luck based card already.

[宇佐見 蓮子@C94]

K, fixed. Dunno why I bothered though.

[Maeriberii Haan]

After reading this card more, this card seems to be quite brutal in the right decks. Resolving this makes you sit on a +2 on summon, while with the correct build, you'll almost never call it wrong (especially in Shinras). I'd say the reward should be lessened, but the risk can also be softened.

[宇佐見 蓮子@C94]

How, though? The risk is a -1, while the reward is +2. Which is why I wanted to keep it so that it needs only one monster to trigger it, so it's less abusable and thus, less broken.

[Maeriberii Haan]

If you make it a +1 that can be turned into a +2 in some occasions with the negative being a -1 that can be made into a +0, or a straight +1/+0 with some form of other drawback, it'll be better rather than praying that you won't hit two of the cards. Removing the double reveal 'restriction' will turn this into a less sacky card and more something like a card that requires a specifically-tuned deck to use it reliably, though, the less extreme effect above can be used to balance the card.

[InfernaLiza]

Maybe, as a bigger risk, you could banish any (revealed cards) that aren't the selected type, and leave the card on the field.

That way, you have the chance for a big monster/summoning an xyz, with the risk of leaving a weak monster on the field and banishing your good cards.