The Seventh Samurai Posted December 9, 2014 Report Share Posted December 9, 2014 Updated and new cards added. Main Deck: 1.Rebel Alliance: T-65 X-Wing 2.Rebel Alliance: T-65 X-Wing 3.Rebel Alliance: T-65 X-Wing 4.Rebel Alliance: A-Wing 5.Rebel Alliance: A-Wing 6.Rebel Alliance: A-Wing 7.Rebel Alliance: Y-Wing 8.Rebel Alliance: Y-Wing 9.Rebel Alliance: Y-Wing 10.New Republic: E-Wing 11.Rebel Alliance: B-Wing12.New Republic: Stealth X-Wing 13.New Republic: Stealth X-Wing 14.New Republic: Stealth X-Wing 15.New Republic: The Redemption16.CR90 Correlian Corvette 17.CR90 Correlian Corvette18.New Republic: Mon Calamari Cruiser 19.New Republic: Mon Calamari Cruiser 20.New Republic: Lusankya 21.Jump to Lightspeed 22.Jump to Lightspeed 23.Jump to Lightspeed 24.Kuat 25.The Star Forge26.Would it help if I got out and pushed? 27.Would it help if I got out and pushed? 28.Would it help if I got out and pushed? 29.Careful Terraforming 30.You have failed me for the last time.31.Raigeki Break 32.Raigeki Break 33.Raigeki Break34.Joker's Trap Hole 35.Joker's Trap Hole 36.Joker's Trap Hole37.Supply Squad 38.Supply Squad 39.Supply Squad 40.Mystical Space Typhoon Extra Deck: 1. Nebulon B Frigate. 2.Nebulon B Frigate. 3.Nebulon B Frigate. 4.Blue-Eyes B. Ultimate Dragon 5.Blue-Eyes B. Ultimate Dragon 6.Blue-Eyes B. Ultimate Dragon 7. Blue-Eyes Black Dragon 8.Blue-Eyes Black Dragon 9.Blue-Eyes Black Dragon 10.Blue-Eyes Twin Dragon 11.Blue-Eyes Twin Dragon 12.Blue-Eyes Twin Dragon 13. Red-Eyes Ultimate Dragon 14. Red-Eyes Ultimate Dragon 15. Red-Eyes Ultimate Dragon Side Deck: 1. No. There is another. 2. No. There is another. 3. No. There is another. 4. Coruscant 5. Coruscant 6. Mystical Space Typhoon 7. New Republic: E-Wing 8. New Republic: E-Wing 9.CR90 Correlian Corvette 10. New Republic: Lusankya 11. Mystical Space Typhoon12.Rebel Alliance: The Redemption13. New Republic: Mon Calamari Cruiser 14. Rebel Alliance: B-Wing 15. Rebel Alliance: B-Wing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Seventh Samurai Posted December 11, 2014 Author Report Share Posted December 11, 2014 bump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Seventh Samurai Posted December 13, 2014 Author Report Share Posted December 13, 2014 could someone please help me understand why this thread was moved to Traditional and not Advanced? appreciated. (bump) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Seventh Samurai Posted December 20, 2014 Author Report Share Posted December 20, 2014 futile bump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Seventh Samurai Posted December 22, 2014 Author Report Share Posted December 22, 2014 Updated and new cards added. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ToaCody Posted January 7, 2015 Report Share Posted January 7, 2015 You might want to consider putting the card effects under the card images. Also, I noticed that these cards seem to follow the same theme of "form fits function" with their effects that mine do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Seventh Samurai Posted January 8, 2015 Author Report Share Posted January 8, 2015 Also, I noticed that these cards seem to follow the same theme of "form fits function" with their effects that mine do. Yes that's how I design all my pop culture cards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tinkerer Posted January 15, 2015 Report Share Posted January 15, 2015 Hmm! I definitely like what you have going on here. Most corrections I have are based on grammar/spelling, but I want to initially say that the mechanics of plussing off of every normal summon isn't exactly healthy. Also, some of the "on summon" effects need to be nerfed or given a "Once/Twice per turn" clause because of the ability to do drastic damage to the opponent (ie. Y-wing, E-wing). Finally, I just want to say that maybe you should add a clause into the "-Wing" monsters so that they can summon 1 OTHER "-Wing" when returned to the hand. This way you would not have to change up Y or E-wing ones. 1. You should change the card from saying "character" to "monster". 2. E-Wing is a Union? I assume you meant to change it to Effect since it's numbered right after XJ-Wing which is a Union. If it IS supposed to be a Union, what are its Union effects? 3. You may want to change A-Wing to an "on summon" effect. 4. You may want to re-post the traps as their symbols are missing 5. You misspelled "loses" on The Redemption 6. (Question) What is "Restricted" on the Star Forge? In any case, these cards gave some real potential. They remind me of another star-based archetype, even! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Seventh Samurai Posted January 16, 2015 Author Report Share Posted January 16, 2015 Hmm! I definitely like what you have going on here. Most corrections I have are based on grammar/spelling, but I want to initially say that the mechanics of plussing off of every normal summon isn't exactly healthy. Also, some of the "on summon" effects need to be nerfed or given a "Once/Twice per turn" clause because of the ability to do drastic damage to the opponent (ie. Y-wing, E-wing). Finally, I just want to say that maybe you should add a clause into the "-Wing" monsters so that they can summon 1 OTHER "-Wing" when returned to the hand. This way you would not have to change up Y or E-wing ones. 1. You should change the card from saying "character" to "monster". 2. E-Wing is a Union? I assume you meant to change it to Effect since it's numbered right after XJ-Wing which is a Union. If it IS supposed to be a Union, what are its Union effects? 3. You may want to change A-Wing to an "on summon" effect. 4. You may want to re-post the traps as their symbols are missing 5. You misspelled "loses" on The Redemption 6. (Question) What is "Restricted" on the Star Forge? In any case, these cards gave some real potential. They remind me of another star-based archetype, even! yeah i guess they have a lot of little errors. "restricted" should be "limited"(only 1 allowed in deck.) No e-wing is not supposed to be union. not sure how that happened. not sure what you're saying with A-wing. the plussing is problematic yes, but kind of neccesary, and in the end I've found that this deck is not at all over powered on Duel Portal. It does some things well but other things it does poorly or not at all, so it kinda balances out. Of course that's not the idea way to balance out at all. I can't think of a solution though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
121092 Posted January 17, 2015 Report Share Posted January 17, 2015 Some of the card lingo look like it could be touched up but the concept is great. Seems not neccisarily a damage dealer, but a great defensive too :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.