Slinky Posted July 21, 2016 Report Share Posted July 21, 2016 1 Darklord Lucifer3 Darklord Ixtab1 Exodius2 Darklord Tezcatlipoca1 Darklord Asmodeus3 Darklord Superbia2 Darklord Zerato1 The Dark(lord) Creator3 Darklord Mastema1 Scapeghost 3 Darklord RotA3 Darklord Reborn1 Raigeki2 Allure of Darkness2 Trade-In1 Soul Charge1 Foolish Burial2 Twin Twisters 2 Darklord MST/Fissure2 Darklord Brain Control3 Call of the Haunted 1 Cloudcastle1 Number 771 Number 841 Number 811 Rail Cannon1 Number 351 Galaxy-Eyes Cipher Blade Dragon1 Phantom Fortress Enterblathnir1 Number 111 Galaxy-Eyes Cipher Dragon1 Number 221 Felgrand1 Galaxy-Eyes Full Armor Photon Dragon1 Number 381 Number 62 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neochu-H Posted July 21, 2016 Report Share Posted July 21, 2016 no fallen ones?teching nurse burn and tiny lp gain is fun tho Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Progenitor Posted July 22, 2016 Report Share Posted July 22, 2016 no fallen ones?teching nurse burn and tiny lp gain is fun thoLeads to a ton of consistency issues in an already somewhat inconsistent deck. Not worth. On topic, have you ironed out most of your inconsistency troubles with this build, or are you still having bricking problems? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tinkerer Posted July 22, 2016 Report Share Posted July 22, 2016 Noting that Exodius is shown in the pic but is missing in the card list. Despite the ease of getting the level 8s to hand, I'm personally not as big a fan of Trade-in in the deck (anymore). Reasoning feels like a stronger option imo as it can get the spells/traps in grave + gives field presence. Anyways, I'm also curious on how consistent this is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slinky Posted July 22, 2016 Author Report Share Posted July 22, 2016 Noting that Exodius is shown in the pic but is missing in the card list. Despite the ease of getting the level 8s to hand, I'm personally not as big a fan of Trade-in in the deck (anymore). Reasoning feels like a stronger option imo as it can get the spells/traps in grave + gives field presence. Anyways, I'm also curious on how consistent this is. Fixed @Exodius. Reasoning is bad, the deck doesn't want randomized mill. Leads to a ton of consistency issues in an already somewhat inconsistent deck. Not worth. On topic, have you ironed out most of your inconsistency troubles with this build, or are you still having bricking problems? Yes, this has ironed out most consistency issues, I still have some issues, but that's a darklord problem. out of the 45ish duels I've done so far, I've bricked 4 times. 1/11 is honestly not that bad for a deck like this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.