Jump to content

Welcome to Yugioh Card Maker Forum
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.
Login to Account Create an Account
Photo

Shinbords: Lose going first!


Necrobump!

Guest, the last post on this topic is over 30 days old and a new post will be considered as necrobumping!



  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1
Dova

Dova

    DovaMember

  • Dova

  • 3,459 posts
    Last Visit Today, 03:45 AM
  • Discord:Dova#1498
  • Alias:Dova
  • Spouse:Dova

Made this deck a while ago, and it hasn't changed much in playtesting. Decided to procrastinate my reviewing even more by posting this.
 


Decklist

 

2 Amano tended to brick, and the Tama pairing seems decent. Handtraps are a must, but decided on Raigeki rather than triple Ogre. Crane is rather helpful at times, bricky at others, but can't think of a better Spirit to put there. Pre-Prep and Trade-In are a must, the latter especially with my okay Kaiju engine. They combo nicely with Baron.

 

Looking to put in Greatfly in the ED when it comes out, but unsure if there's really a need. Double UTL because space, and Number 41 is a decent card to go into going first, but I rarely draw the Tama combo anyway. Diawolf is kinda neat when I keep my tokens, or just with Crane, Tornado is decent vs Magicians, and Dweller because Dweller. Tachyon....eh, good to have one R8 in there just in case. No real need for Links as far as I can see.

 
Really dunno how to build a side deck. I want to keep Continuous S/T to a minimum to take advantage of Evenly Matched, but I didn't know what would be better than Prohibition. Also, this deck always loses going first, and I am unsure how to change that. I thought of URA, but it seems meh, and the Kaiju engine seems to be relatively consistent.

 

CnC?



#2
Spinny

Spinny

    16/04/18 His Salubriousness

  • Monokubs

  • 3,905 posts
    Last Visit Aug 13 2018 09:21 AM
  • Alias:TheLocalSpinda
  • Spouse:Isaac

I always got the impression that the point of the deck was to make use of urgent ritual art in order to cuck the opponent with the barons so that would be my suggestion if you could somehow make that work.

Also as this is tcg and you find yourself losing going first, Scapegoat really doesnt hurt, it's an incredibly potent card (but note it doesnt work in conjunction with urgent ritual art).


Posted Image


#3
Dova

Dova

    DovaMember

  • Topic Starter
  • Dova

  • 3,459 posts
    Last Visit Today, 03:45 AM
  • Discord:Dova#1498
  • Alias:Dova
  • Spouse:Dova

I always got the impression that the point of the deck was to make use of urgent ritual art in order to cuck the opponent with the barons so that would be my suggestion if you could somehow make that work.

Also as this is tcg and you find yourself losing going first, Scapegoat really doesnt hurt, it's an incredibly potent card (but note it doesnt work in conjunction with urgent ritual art).

 

The URA build is too inconsistent for me, at least my variation. If I do play it, I need to commit fully, but it not being searchable really hurts it. Scapegoat...huh. I'll see about space.






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users