Serenity the Candyman Posted October 2, 2010 Author Report Share Posted October 2, 2010 they did pay $9 dollars but that is not the solution Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cloister Posted October 2, 2010 Report Share Posted October 2, 2010 Ohh you. Anyways, can you put the old riddles up? Just for fun. EDIT: 9x3=27... Ehh, fail math much? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sotos Posted October 2, 2010 Report Share Posted October 2, 2010 Guest 1:10 Guest 2:10 Guest 3:10 Ballboy:0 Hotel:0 [font="arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif"][size="2"]Guest 1:0 Guest 2:0[/size][/font] Guest 3:0 Ballboy:0 Hotel:30 [font="arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif"][size="2"]Guest 1:0 Guest 2:0[/size][/font] Guest 3:0 Ballboy:5 Hotel:25 [font="arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif"][size="2"]Guest 1:1 Guest 2:1[/size][/font] Guest 3:1 Ballboy:2 Hotel:25 So, 1+1+1+2+25=30... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom M.C. Posted October 2, 2010 Report Share Posted October 2, 2010 they only paid 28 dollars since they originally paid 30, but the bellboy took away the 2 dollars so each person did not pay 30/3=10 dollars but rather 30-2=28 28/3=amount of money each person payed 28/3 x 3 + 2(the money bellboy took away) = 30 dollars Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sotos Posted October 2, 2010 Report Share Posted October 2, 2010 And with all the Guests together, it's Guests:30 Ballboy:0 Hotel:0 Guests:0 Ballboy:0 Hotel:30 Guests:0 Ballboy:5 Hotel:25 Guests:3 Ballboy:2 Hotel:25 Still, 3+2+25=30... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Serenity the Candyman Posted October 2, 2010 Author Report Share Posted October 2, 2010 The the question is: How did we end up with $1 dollar missing, that is what I'm looking for. Explain this and you will get the rep. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom M.C. Posted October 2, 2010 Report Share Posted October 2, 2010 they only paid 28 dollars since they originally paid 30, but the bellboy took away the 2 dollars so each person did not pay 30/3=10 dollars but rather 30-2=28 28/3=amount of money each person payed 28/3 x 3 + 2(the money bellboy took away) = 30 dollars the missing dollar is in the 2 dollars taken away by the bellboy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Serenity the Candyman Posted October 2, 2010 Author Report Share Posted October 2, 2010 That is what I was looking for Phantom M.C., +1 rep to you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sotos Posted October 2, 2010 Report Share Posted October 2, 2010 [color="#1C2837"][size="2"]If A is honestant he will say he is a honestant, or, if A is swindlecant he will also say he is a honestant. So if B says that A says he is a swindlecant he must be lying, so he is a swindlecant, so C is a honestant...[/size][/color][img]http://forum.yugiohcardmaker.net/public/style_emoticons/default/wink.gif[/img] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom M.C. Posted October 2, 2010 Report Share Posted October 2, 2010 2 answers b is a swindlecat and c is a honestant or vice versa Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squirrel Girl Posted October 2, 2010 Report Share Posted October 2, 2010 Both are swindlecat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NobleShadow Posted October 2, 2010 Report Share Posted October 2, 2010 B is a swindlecat and C is a Honestant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Serenity the Candyman Posted October 3, 2010 Author Report Share Posted October 3, 2010 Sotos gets +1 rep Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom M.C. Posted October 3, 2010 Report Share Posted October 3, 2010 could you rephrase what the aboriginal said in riddle 8? i don't quite get it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Serenity the Candyman Posted October 3, 2010 Author Report Share Posted October 3, 2010 No I can not, for that is the riddle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom M.C. Posted October 3, 2010 Report Share Posted October 3, 2010 i believe both are swindlecats Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sotos Posted October 3, 2010 Report Share Posted October 3, 2010 I think that either both are Honestants, or both are Swindlecants...[img]http://forum.yugiohcardmaker.net/public/style_emoticons/default/blink.gif[/img] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Serenity the Candyman Posted October 4, 2010 Author Report Share Posted October 4, 2010 Which is it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sirAragorn Posted October 4, 2010 Report Share Posted October 4, 2010 Neither are swindleants or honestants. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Serenity the Candyman Posted October 4, 2010 Author Report Share Posted October 4, 2010 Then what are they?Then what are they? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sirAragorn Posted October 4, 2010 Report Share Posted October 4, 2010 Humans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Serenity the Candyman Posted October 4, 2010 Author Report Share Posted October 4, 2010 Funny, but no Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sliver King Posted October 4, 2010 Report Share Posted October 4, 2010 They are both brownies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Serenity the Candyman Posted October 4, 2010 Author Report Share Posted October 4, 2010 Really? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sliver King Posted October 4, 2010 Report Share Posted October 4, 2010 I got it. The is no such thing as a swindlecant or an honestant. They are both liars. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.