Ｄｈａｒｃ Posted October 22, 2011 Report Share Posted October 22, 2011 [center][center] [/center][/center] [center][center][size=5]Here's my very own Dragon Beatdown. It's fairly consistent, and the only time it has lost is against Pulsar FTK.[/size] [/center][/center] [center][center] [/center][/center] [center][center][size=5]Please, CnC.[/size] [/center][/center] [center][center] [/center][/center] [center][center] [/center][/center] [center][center] [/center][/center] [center][center][img]http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/3521/dracometeor.png[/img] [/center][/center] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunn O))) Posted October 22, 2011 Report Share Posted October 22, 2011 -3 Lancer Lindwurm -1 Dodger Dragon +2 Koa'ki Meiru Drago + Red-Eyes Wyvern -1 Strong Wind Dragon -1 Prime Material +2 Light Pulsar Dragon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ｄｈａｒｃ Posted October 22, 2011 Author Report Share Posted October 22, 2011 Sorry, should've mentioned, I wanted to make a Dragon Deck w/o Pulsar. A little matter of principle, if you will. And Koa'ki Meiru severely limits my options, as the majority of my key monsters (I.E. Darkness and Photon) are blocked by him. And Red-Eyes Wyvern is meh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunn O))) Posted October 22, 2011 Report Share Posted October 22, 2011 That makes my previous post invalid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ｄｈａｒｃ Posted October 22, 2011 Author Report Share Posted October 22, 2011 Sorry. Thanks anyway, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CDDRodrigo Posted October 22, 2011 Report Share Posted October 22, 2011 >Wyvern >Meh wat It's one of the best cards O_O Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ｄｈａｒｃ Posted October 22, 2011 Author Report Share Posted October 22, 2011 It doesn't work for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CDDRodrigo Posted October 22, 2011 Report Share Posted October 22, 2011 [quote name='Makoto Nanaya' timestamp='1319306647' post='5593788'] It doesn't work for me. [/quote] Future Fusion Send 2x of it and 2x REDMD and Galaxy-Eyes End turn, summon 2x REDMD Win the duel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ｄｈａｒｃ Posted October 22, 2011 Author Report Share Posted October 22, 2011 Oh. Never knew abut that combo. Meh, I never draw Future anyway. Alexandrite and Lancer work really well, so I'm staying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manjoume Thunder Posted October 22, 2011 Report Share Posted October 22, 2011 Threads like this one should be locked on sight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Nu-13 Posted October 22, 2011 Report Share Posted October 22, 2011 Why are you so goddamn stubborn and retarded? ._. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Resident Fascist Posted October 22, 2011 Report Share Posted October 22, 2011 [quote name='Noel Vermillion' timestamp='1319307097' post='5593808'] Why are you so goddamn stubborn and retarded? ._. [/quote] It's YCM. Don't take anyone's intelligence for granted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ｄｈａｒｃ Posted October 22, 2011 Author Report Share Posted October 22, 2011 Noel, are you referring to Manjoume or me? In either case, that statement was uncalled for. And it's my fault if I don't want to run Wyvern, so if that displeases you, I understand. I know you're all trying to help, but I just wish for you to acknowledge that I'm making my own decisions, and if I lose, well, that's my fault. Also, Manjoume, why should this thread be locked? Care to elaborate? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Nu-13 Posted October 22, 2011 Report Share Posted October 22, 2011 To you, Manjy ninja'd me. "I know this card is amazing and will make the deck much better, but I won't play it" Really dude -.- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ｄｈａｒｃ Posted October 22, 2011 Author Report Share Posted October 22, 2011 Regardless, the way you said it was rather rude. And I apologize, but as I said, if my deck suffers, so be it. If I start losing more often, then I will start running Wyvern. Are you happy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CDDRodrigo Posted October 22, 2011 Report Share Posted October 22, 2011 Decks are posted here so that they are fixed to win more T_T Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Nu-13 Posted October 22, 2011 Report Share Posted October 22, 2011 It's internet. If you're not unnecessarily rude to people, you're doing it wrong. Also, Alex, saw this in Rules? [quote] [b]9. The Jack Witt Clause[/b] All deck topics are treated as rate and fix topics. This means that, when you post your deck, you will receive comments and evaluations of the deck's quality from other members and suggestions as to how to improve it. If you cannot deal with this, then do not post your deck. If you post your deck and then show that you cannot or will not accept constructive criticism, you will not only appear childish but also run the risk of having your topics closed. [/quote] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ｄｈａｒｃ Posted October 22, 2011 Author Report Share Posted October 22, 2011 I understand the Jack Witt clause. However, it does not explicitly state that I MUST change my deck according to suggestions. I am to acknowledge that they are SUGGESTIONS, and I do not feel as though I am not taking criticism effectively. If I am, I apologize. I may seem childish, and I acknowledge this, but I am not going to change my deck RIGHT NOW because a "better card" is being offered. I have acknowledged that it may be a good card and be even superior to the ones within my current deck, but I am not going to change immediately. The Jack Witt clause does not cover that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dementuo Posted October 22, 2011 Report Share Posted October 22, 2011 He's accepting the criticism just fine. As he said, he'll run Wyvern when he starts losing more often. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CDDRodrigo Posted October 22, 2011 Report Share Posted October 22, 2011 You're ignoring the suggestion, thus not taking it, thus not dealing with it, thus breaking the rule. Also, why wait to lose to fix the deck if you can fix it without losing? :S Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ｄｈａｒｃ Posted October 22, 2011 Author Report Share Posted October 22, 2011 I'm ACKNOWLEDGING it. That doesn't mean I must run the card, it means that I understand your point and am not going to complain and b**** and moan and whine about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dementuo Posted October 22, 2011 Report Share Posted October 22, 2011 [quote name='Konoe A. Mercury' timestamp='1319308694' post='5593860']You're ignoring the suggestion, [b]No, he's not. He said "If I lose more often, I'll run Wyvern", which sounds like taking it into account to me.[/b] thus not taking it, [b]Except he did.[/b] thus not dealing with it, [b]Except, he did.[/b] thus breaking the rule. [b]Except he didn't.[/b] Also, why wait to lose to fix the deck if you can fix it without losing? [b]Who says he's going to lose? Of course, it's a large possibility, but if he hasn't been losing, then there's little reason to change the deck. By the looks of it, all he's asking for is suggestions to use in the future, should the deck begin to fail.[/b][/quote] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CDDRodrigo Posted October 22, 2011 Report Share Posted October 22, 2011 Dash, it's just illogical to wait until he starts losing to make a change that will help him win more T_T Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ｄｈａｒｃ Posted October 22, 2011 Author Report Share Posted October 22, 2011 Thank you, Rainbow. But how do you know it will make me win more if I've lost twice with the deck, those losses being attributed to Pulsar FTK and Chaos BLS? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dementuo Posted October 22, 2011 Report Share Posted October 22, 2011 [quote name='Konoe A. Mercury' timestamp='1319308954' post='5593870']Dash, it's just illogical to wait until he starts losing to make a change that will help him win more T_T[/quote] In most cases, you're right. But that's not my point. My point is that people are unnecessarily insulting both Makoto and his style of play/deck building, when he's not breaking any rules. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.