Random card ideas, please leave helpful comments! I take suggestions, and I can take criticism!

[dylan11932]

Please rate out of 10 points- overall as far as graphics, playability, grammer/wording, overpowered or not, etc.
[color=#000000][img]http://img13.imageshack.us/img13/3236/507495.jpg[/img][/color]

[color=#000000] [img]http://img607.imageshack.us/img607/3236/507495.jpg[/img] [/color]

[color=#000000] [img]http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/3236/507495.jpg[/img] [/color]
[color=#000000] [/color]

[size=5][color=#FF0000][b]FIRST THREE, PLEASE RATE- MORE TO COME!!! [/b][/color][/size]

[Gojira/Godzilla]

do you mean random card ideas or random ideas for new types of card?

[dylan11932]

The cards I posted at the beginning, what do you rate them as far as playability, graphics, usability, etc.?

[Gojira/Godzilla]

they are ok i would say about 6/10 but 7/10 for that dragon synchro

[ragnarok1945]

Aura Dragon is meh for just atk determining effect

furthermore it's not likely to get more than 2100 because most times your opponent won't have more than 3 cards in the hand

[Blake]

The equip is really specific and does nothing outside of a mirror match.

WTF is a Shadow? Elaborate? 'Cause Ragnarok is stupid, and that effect is insanely broken.

Ace in the hole is meh, and there's no such thing as a Counter Spell =/

[Gojira/Godzilla]

[quote name='Yuzuru Otonashi' timestamp='1320353374' post='5615207']
The equip is really specific and does nothing outside of a mirror match.

WTF is a Shadow? Elaborate? 'Cause Ragnarok is stupid, and that effect is insanely broken.

Ace in the hole is meh, and there's no such thing as a Counter Spell =/
[/quote]
and although the effect is broken it is a good pic and with a bit of work could be a great card

[quote name='ragnarok1945' timestamp='1320352983' post='5615184']
Aura Dragon is meh for just atk determining effect

furthermore it's not likely to get more than 2100 because most times your opponent won't have more than 3 cards in the hand
[/quote]
how would it only get 2100?

[dylan11932]

"Shadow" is an archetype pertaining to various other monster-cards I've designed, and in actuality is not an existing archetype. However, the original effect said 'fiend' as a replacement so you tell me, but...on another note, I didnt want to OP the effects on the cards by making more outlandish effects. The original effect was to destroy all dragon monsters in play and add their collective ATK/DEF to the dragon.

[Blake]

The original effect is a lot less broken, and rather situational, as it'd be a anti-disaster tech ._.

And cards can' have 2 types AKA fiend.

[dylan11932]

Hang on, I'll remedy that fact, and I'm very gracious for your criticism.

I fixed the effect, what do you think?

[ragnarok1945]

[quote name='optimus327prime' timestamp='1320353722' post='5615237']
and although the effect is broken it is a good pic and with a bit of work could be a great card


how would it only get 2100?
[/quote]

well now you changed the effect

before you said its atk = number of cards your opponent sent to the graveyard *700

[dylan11932]

The original effect is the one which I reverted it to. The original one seemed to be less "broken" for an official match, as I have other cards with similar effects pertaining to dragon-archetype monsters.