Jump to content

Tank Bug - Your opinion?


bchrasher

Recommended Posts

ytLaV.jpg

Need your opinion for this card. Image source is deviantart~htkpeh.

Effect: When this card is summoned, turn it to defence position and put 3 spell counters on it. Increase this monsters DEF by 800 for each spell counter on it. When this card gets destroyed by an card effect, remove 1 spell counter instead. When there are no spell counters on this card, you have to switch it in attack-position.

Feel free to report my grammar errors.

 

UPDATE:

 

sqsez3n.jpg

Effect: When this card is Normal/FLIP- or Tribute Summoned, turn it to Defence Position and put 3 tank counters on it. Increase this monsters DEF by 400 for each tank counter on it. When this card gets destroyed by an card effect: Remove 1 tank counter instead. When there are no tank counters on this card, you have to switch it in Attack Position.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Effect: When this card is summoned, turn it to defense position and place 3 spell counters on it. Increase this monster's DEF by 800 for each spell counter on it. When this card is destroyed by a card effect, remove 1 spell counter from this card instead. When there are no spell counters on this card, switch this card into ATK position.

This card's kinda OP'd. Insect type using spell counters? Well...but since this card is your first card, it's kinda nice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's Level 7 and it's still overpowered IMO. Because of it's low ATK it's very easy for searchers to get it out of the Deck, then you've got a 4400 DEF monster with a good defending effect as well. Change it to "When this card is Normal Summoned" or "When this card is Tribute Summoned" ("Summon" always in caps). Then it should be good.

I like it, for your first card it's pretty cool (:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A monster that defends by sheer magic not by sheer strength like Rock-Type ones. Should've been a Rock-Type monster then it fits. Anyways

 

Lore correction: (Maybe?)

 

When this card is Tribute Summoned; switch it to face-up Defense Position and place 3 Spell Counters on it. Increase this card's DEF by 800 for each Spell Counters on it. If this card is to be destroyed by a card effect controlled by your opponent; remove 1 Spell Counter from this card instead. If this card has no Spell Counters on it; switch it to face-up Attack Position.

 

Well, it does require 2 tributes to be summoned and it does not do any damage at all except it is one huge indestructible wall of 4400 DEF and the chances of card effects that will be used by your opponent depends on his deck. So yeah, overpowered in my opinion too. Maybe increase this card's DEF by 400 for each Spell Counter on it. Then you're gonna have a 3200 DEF with 3 times saving itself if destroyed by a card effect. And of course the opponent may just BANISH it so the effect doesn't apply so if used against a Banish deck then the 4400 DEF was worth it but for the sake of the other decks, 3200 DEF is more balanced and merciful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with each Spell Counter raising only 400 DEF and not 800. Also, why Spell Counters? You could use a Tank Counter or dunno, suits better. Also, another ocg correction:

 

"If this card is to be destroyed by a card effect controlled by your opponent: Remove 1 Spell Counter from this card instead."

 

It's a colon, not a semi-colon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, the card design says "Lol, u can't get over me!!!" providing the player who uses it with way too much safety for my liking and stalling out the duel unnecessarily. However, since its a 2-tribute monster, the only deck that can feasibly run this is Frogs, but they don't want this because they have caius and LaDD. It probably wouldn't be used IRL, so it doesn't need any buffs or nerfs whatsoever, but the fact remains that the design is a bit bland.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...