-Noel- Posted November 28, 2013 Report Share Posted November 28, 2013 Well i just got a chance to bought a LAVL box, and there's a new Plant-Archetype "Shinra" (or "Sylvan" for TCG) (yea maybe not so new, but i just have ever played this today > <) and i like their concepts, also with some of "Princess" plant cards i have played well with that archetype, after some playtest i found out that i often have a chance to have 2 face-up Mirabi Peas (that Lv.1 that also exist in DN as "Sylvan Peaskeeper") since it ss effect can also ss itself from the Graveyard so i got an idea of this card. All CnC welcome, just change its name and text from Shinra to Sylvan, well want some comments about this card :) Lore: 2 Level 1 "Sylvan" monters Once per turn: You can detach 1 Xyz Material from this card; choose 1 "Sylvan" card from your Deck or Graveyard and place it on top of your Deck. If this face-up card would be destroyed: Excavate the top card of your deck, and if it is a Plant-Type monster, send it to the Graveyard, and if you do, this card is not destroyed. Otherwise place that card on the bottom of the Deck and destroy this card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Noel- Posted November 28, 2013 Author Report Share Posted November 28, 2013 bump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Noel- Posted November 28, 2013 Author Report Share Posted November 28, 2013 bump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted November 28, 2013 Report Share Posted November 28, 2013 You don't have to actually list Plant-Type Shinras for the requirements since Shinra ARE pure Plant-Type. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Noel- Posted November 28, 2013 Author Report Share Posted November 28, 2013 oh yea thx, maybe im confused while made that XD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Noel- Posted November 29, 2013 Author Report Share Posted November 29, 2013 bump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Noel- Posted December 5, 2013 Author Report Share Posted December 5, 2013 bump, also edited it for TCG name Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
razzy Posted December 12, 2013 Report Share Posted December 12, 2013 Neat Xyz. I was planning on a similar R1 Sylvan. The last effect "If this face-up card would be destroyed: You can reveal the top card of your deck, and if it is a Plant-Type monster, send it to the Graveyard, Otherwise, return it to the bottom of your Deck and destroy this card, instead." Would read better as: If this face-up card would be destroyed (by battle or card effect): Excavate the top card of your deck, and if it is a Plant-Type monster, send it to the Graveyard, and if you do, this card is not destroyed. Otherwise place that card on the bottom of the Deck, and destroy this card. Not sure if those last 4 words "and destroy this card" are needed but whatevs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Noel- Posted December 13, 2013 Author Report Share Posted December 13, 2013 oh that's nice fixing (well still dont used to "excavate" at all XD) and well im not so sure how to write the effect that prevent destruction mix with excavate that way from the start but about that () it's no need to have that part, but if it have. it should be (either by battle or by card effect) since this part only exists for use to described when destroyed by ur opponent cards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
razzy Posted December 13, 2013 Report Share Posted December 13, 2013 oh that's nice fixing (well still dont used to "excavate" at all XD) and well im not so sure how to write the effect that prevent destruction mix with excavate that way from the start but about that () it's no need to have that part, but if it have. it should be (either by battle or by card effect) since this part only exists for use to described when destroyed by ur opponent cards I thought that's how () worked but wasn't sure. And I'm not sure if I like the way I worded the "Excavate if Plant-Type do not destroy part"... it just seems difficult to get it to say what i want you know? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Noel- Posted December 13, 2013 Author Report Share Posted December 13, 2013 I thought that's how () worked but wasn't sure. And I'm not sure if I like the way I worded the "Excavate if Plant-Type do not destroy part"... it just seems difficult to get it to say what i want you know? well i have no problem understanding ur text, in fact it better than my first one a lot and yea since this is the new mixing of effects so unless Konami make sth similar to this i didnt serious about it's lore so much Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.