DarkGreyWing Posted February 18, 2014 Report Share Posted February 18, 2014 2 or more level 9 DARK monsters This card cannot be destroyed by battle or by card effects. You can detatch 1 Xyz material from this card to equip one monster your opponent controls to this card. This card gains ATK equal to the total attack of the equipped monsters, and DEF equal to the total defense of the equipped monsters. This card cannot attack. Once per turn, you can send one card equipped to this card to the graveyard to inflict damage to your opponent equal to it's ATK or DEF. Alright so, I felt like I needed to make this. He would have been Rank 10 but, REDMD. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
death00 Posted February 19, 2014 Report Share Posted February 19, 2014 you can simplify that line there that says: "This card gains ATK equal to the total attack of the equipped monsters, and DEF equal to the total defense of the equipped monsters." By saying: "This card gains ATK and DEF equal to the total respective ATK and DEF of monsters equipped to it." Or "This card gains ATK and DEF equal to the total ATK and DEF of monsters equipped to it, respectively." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Akron The Void Lord Posted February 19, 2014 Report Share Posted February 19, 2014 To me, this seems, although a bit different, it's veeery similar to Relinquished, which is OP as hell. Even if it's a Rank 9 Xyz, being able to twice take a Monster and then send it to the Graveyard and deal damage equal to either it's ATK or DEF. If your opponent has even decently powerful monsters on the field, this card can single-handedly win you the entire Duel. Even if it can only do it two times, it's still crazy strong. Maybe tone it down to half the ATK or DEF? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunn O))) Posted February 19, 2014 Report Share Posted February 19, 2014 To me, this seems, although a bit different, it's veeery similar to Relinquished, which is OP as hell. Relinquished is OP? Since when? Make it once per turn and make it target, and it will be more balanced, because as it currently is, it can get rid of anything not called Evilswarm Thanatos. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Masaaki71484 Posted February 20, 2014 Report Share Posted February 20, 2014 ^ I agree TER Has not been OP for almost 10 years now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarkGreyWing Posted February 26, 2014 Author Report Share Posted February 26, 2014 I agree, it's OP, but only because it's nearly impossible to get out. You'll most likely only get out 2 level 9 Xyz monsters in one out of ten duels Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepy Posted February 27, 2014 Report Share Posted February 27, 2014 ^ I agree TER Has not been OP for almost 10 years now Relinquished is not OP at all. Thousand-Eyes Restrict is. Which is not the card they are talking about. OT: I'd say that for what it is, it's pretty weak. You could make it a generic Rank 9 and able to attack. The protection effect feels a little bit cheap to be honest, but other than that, it's probably the same end result that Number 101 does, but with more troubles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted February 27, 2014 Report Share Posted February 27, 2014 The protection effect feels a little bit cheap to be honest, but other than that, it's probably the same end result that Number 101 does, but with more troubles.Basically, this.The card in the OP is, more or less, a weird Ark Knight.Except it has 0 ATK/DEF, unless you keep the monster attached to it for the next turn. But even then, that depends on what your capable of equipping.But anyway...TC, go with Sleepy's advice, as far as Summoning it goes. 2 Level 9s is pretty obscure and rather difficult in it's own right, and if your using them to make this card; Not really worth it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.