enesyugiohfan Posted June 14, 2014 Report Share Posted June 14, 2014 Guys, before I release the completed Light-Gold Set, I need your opinions on a card, as I am not sure if it sounds like a realistic Yu-Gi-Oh! card effect. So, here it is and thank you for taking your time! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucas Thampwison Posted June 14, 2014 Report Share Posted June 14, 2014 I can't read the effect as it is too small on my tablet so would you please type it underneath? However the name and picture both look boring and it looks ridiculously OP and unrealistic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newhat Posted June 15, 2014 Report Share Posted June 15, 2014 Its effect is (This card must be placed in the Extra Deck). Must first be Special Summoned (from your Extra Deck) by having 500 Life Points or less. If this card is Special Summoned: Destroy all other cards you control, also banish your hand, and at the end of your 3rd turn after Summoning this card, you lose the Duel. This card cannot be destroyed by battle or card effects. You cannot Summon, activate cards or effects, or Set any cards. In the unlikely event you were forced down below 500 Life Points, this can easily win the Duel by itself. In the likely event that you paid a bunch of Life Points to intentionally burn yourself down, this will win the Duel by itself. You can also pair it with an indestructible monster that it won't blow up. Either way I don't think it's consistent enough to be dangerous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
enesyugiohfan Posted June 23, 2014 Author Report Share Posted June 23, 2014 Any ideas of what I should change it to then? Thanks so far :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
98rbake Posted June 23, 2014 Report Share Posted June 23, 2014 I would change it to an actual Extra Deck Monster, just to avoid controversy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.