Jump to content

Thousand-Eyes Restrict


Recommended Posts

300px-ThousandEyesRestrictRP02-EN-UR-UE.

 

"Relinquished" + "Thousand-Eyes Idol"

As long as this card remains face-up on the field, other monsters cannot change their battle positions or attack. Select 1 monster on your opponent's side of the field, and equip it to this card (this effect can only be used once per turn, and you can only equip 1 monster at a time to this card). The ATK and DEF of this card become the same amounts as the monster equipped to this card. If this card is destroyed as a result of battle, the equipped monster is destroyed instead.

 

I expect I am one of the only people who is looking forward to Norden coming to the TCG, although only because it means that Instant Fusion would be put on the limited list eventually (probably) and then this can get unbanned, and my Relinquished deck can be complete.

 

Anyway, what are people's thoughts about this card?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nostalgia incarnate in just 1 fusion.

 

This thing is probably the ultimate Lockdown Fusion, preventing any others from attacking and thus destroying it before it can copy something.

 

...speaking of which, how the hell are you supposed to attack this thing? Towers?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Instant fusion is not guaranteed to be limited, but if it gets the hit, I want this as an option.

 

Yeah, I expect they would probably not hit it for a while (if they do), as they would want to sell the Tins as much as possible.

 

Nostalgia incarnate in just 1 fusion.

 

This thing is probably the ultimate Lockdown Fusion, preventing any others from attacking and thus destroying it before it can copy something.

 

...speaking of which, how the hell are you supposed to attack this thing? Towers?

 

By chaining Multiply to its effect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tbh, it probably would do almost nothing to the meta even with 3 IF if noden got banned. Nobody's gonna run around splashing instant fusion in tellarknights or something without noden just for the ability to randomly summon TER and I doubt a TER.dek would be more than a cool pet deck. Plus, there's a lot of removal for it that isnt battle destruction now from the extra deck and such.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tbh, it probably would do almost nothing to the meta even with 3 IF if noden got banned. Nobody's gonna run around splashing instant fusion in tellarknights or something without noden just for the ability to randomly summon TER and I doubt a TER.dek would be more than a cool pet deck. Plus, there's a lot of removal for it that isnt battle destruction now from the extra deck and such.

This is non-targeting, non-destruction removal. It is crazy strong.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nostalgia incarnate in just 1 fusion.

 

This thing is probably the ultimate Lockdown Fusion, preventing any others from attacking and thus destroying it before it can copy something.

 

...speaking of which, how the hell are you supposed to attack this thing? Towers?

"Apoqliphort Towers" is unaffected by activated monster effects; since this card's attack locking effect is contiuous, "Apoqliphort Towers" won't be able to attck it either…

 

There however is still the option of destroying it using card effects, or negating its effect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Apoqliphort Towers" is unaffected by activated monster effects; since this card's attack locking effect is contiuous, "Apoqliphort Towers" won't be able to attck it either…

 

There however is still the option of destroying it using card effects, or negating its effect.

Oh yeah. Towers isn't immune to continuous effects.

 

I'm aware that card effect destruction and negation can be used against it. I just want to know why that last effect, the battle destruction prevention one, is even there if it already has an effect that prevents other cards from attacking or defending.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh yeah. Towers isn't immune to continuous effects.

 

I'm aware that card effect destruction and negation can be used against it. I just want to know why that last effect, the battle destruction prevention one, is even there if it already has an effect that prevents other cards from attacking or defending.

 

Because you might want to ram this into an opponent's monster so you can equip a new monster to this? Of course, that would be better if it also had the 'deals damage equal to the amount of battle damage you took' thing that Relinquished has.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh yeah. Towers isn't immune to continuous effects.

 

I'm aware that card effect destruction and negation can be used against it. I just want to know why that last effect, the battle destruction prevention one, is even there if it already has an effect that prevents other cards from attacking or defending.

 

It can steal a thing, wait for the next turn and ram itself off something else to steal that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because you might want to ram this into an opponent's monster so you can equip a new monster to this? Of course, that would be better if it also had the 'deals damage equal to the amount of battle damage you took' thing that Relinquished has.

 

It can steal a thing, wait for the next turn and ram itself off something else to steal that.

Ah.

 

...hm. I've never thought of that tactic. Thanks, guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lava golem requires 2 on the opponent's field.

 

And unless it is confirmed to target by Konami, select does not necessarily mean target. Tbh, this card desperately needs PSCT

I mean even comparing it to a lot of other "take a monster" cards it's guaranteed to be targeting and it even obviously looks like it does.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The difference is those give your opponent actual monsters, and Claws gives the opp a card. TER just says "f*** that" and takes it without you being able to do relatively anything about it (Monster negation aside ofc).

 

You're still getting rid of something they want and unless you're being an idiot you have some kind of follow-up play for it. But the point was that being non-targeting and non-destruction removal doesn't make a card amazing by itself, especially since this does actually target anyway by the looks of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Konami is too paranoid over This card because Call/Oasis/etc is suddenly Threatening Roar.

I find this a lot funnier than I should.

 

But yeah, since this doesn't have a Nomi clause, you can just Summon this thing from the Grave/banished pile/whatever and prevent any battles that this thing doesn't start.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So a question I have: Do this and Relinquished copy original ATK/DEF, or the current?

 

It copies original stats, because the targeted monster becomes an equip card, so any modifications to its stats stop applying (since it's not a monster anymore).

 

Instant Fusion is the main reason this is banned, because while the lockdown is incredibly stall-y, the issue is that Instant Fusion treats it as a Fusion Summon, so you can revive it with the plethora of revival we have around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...