Jump to content

Yu-Gi-Oh! Rulings Questions


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 16.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Yet another question: If I chain Imperial Iron Wall to the activation of Allure of Darkness, does the Allure player's hand get discarded regardless because he/she cannot remove a DARK monster? When dealing with Common Charity, the ruling is that you just have to show that you have a Normal Monster, and the removal disappears. I wonder if it's the same for Allure of Darkness.

 

Because, if it is, that might be a nice Side for my weird Zombie build I'm working on...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did anyone answer my question? It's slightly imperative to how I construct my deck.

 

Nope. Nobody did.

 

Yet another question: If I chain Imperial Iron Wall to the activation of Allure of Darkness' date=' does the Allure player's hand get discarded regardless because he/she cannot remove a DARK monster? When dealing with Common Charity, the ruling is that you just have to show that you have a Normal Monster, and the removal disappears. I wonder if it's the same for Allure of Darkness.

 

Because, if it is, that might be a nice Side for my weird Zombie build I'm working on...

[/quote']

 

I think it's ruled the same as Summon Limit vs. Test Tiger.

Test Tiger's effect cannot Special Summon a Gladiator Beast, so the effect just disappears.

http://entertainment.upperdeck.com/community/forums/thread/1365602.aspx

 

Allure's effect forces you to remove a DARK monster, it's not an option, so I think it just can't resolve because it'll have to remove a DARK monster. It'll disappear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did anyone answer my question? It's slightly imperative to how I construct my deck.

 

Nope. Nobody did.

 

Yet another question: If I chain Imperial Iron Wall to the activation of Allure of Darkness' date=' does the Allure player's hand get discarded regardless because he/she cannot remove a DARK monster? When dealing with Common Charity, the ruling is that you just have to show that you have a Normal Monster, and the removal disappears. I wonder if it's the same for Allure of Darkness.

 

Because, if it is, that might be a nice Side for my weird Zombie build I'm working on...

[/quote']

 

I think it's ruled the same as Summon Limit vs. Test Tiger.

Test Tiger's effect cannot Special Summon a Gladiator Beast, so the effect just disappears.

http://entertainment.upperdeck.com/community/forums/thread/1365602.aspx

 

Allure's effect forces you to remove a DARK monster, it's not an option, so I think it just can't resolve because it'll have to remove a DARK monster. It'll disappear.

 

But Common Charity is practically the same effect as Allure, and it's ruled in a way that allows the draw, but the removal effect disappears. Unless that's what you are saying...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

' pid='1052951' dateline='1220202472']

New Question: I control a Burden of the Mighty' date=' and I have a Bottomless face-down. Opponent summons Stratos. Can I activate Bottomless?

[/quote']

 

Nope. Burden of the Mighty has a Continuous effect, so Stratos's ATK is 1400 the moment it hits the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...