GoldenTide Posted October 17, 2016 Report Share Posted October 17, 2016 Unfair TradeNormal SpellDiscard 1 Level 1 monster, draw 2 cards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abdelrahman Posted October 17, 2016 Report Share Posted October 17, 2016 Needs a hard OPT imo. Not sure what else to say though. It's a good card, it just needs a hard OPT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Megamaw Posted October 18, 2016 Report Share Posted October 18, 2016 I don't think this needs a hard OPT. It's not a continuous, and it's a +0. It's like Destiny Draw in that it can be very powerful if you dump the right things, or can simply help you dig for answers. As someone who runs a Level 1 petdeck, this would be a nice addition. Even though Exodia runs 4 Level 1 vanillas, I don't think they'd want to discard them at all. Simple, to the point, nice. As it's worded right now, however, discarding is part of the effect, and not a cost. Is that intentional? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Flyer - Sakura Posted October 18, 2016 Report Share Posted October 18, 2016 I don't know if he accidentally worded it improperly as opposed to borrowing Trade-In's effect written in proper PSCT, or he did from an older style. Let's assume it's supposed to be a Level 1 equivalent of Trade-In. (If he did intend for it to be part of the effect, then I'll revise this) ----I agree that this card doesn't need a hard OPT, since unlike Trade-In in stuff like Blue-Eyes / Level 8 spam, the Decks that can use this aren't as common. I guess Skull Servants can use this for added draw power, and get stuff into the Graveyard when needed. With Exodia, they're foolish if they discard the pieces, so them using this is a no; least without them running random Level 1s. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoldenTide Posted October 18, 2016 Author Report Share Posted October 18, 2016 This was meant to be a Trade-In for Level 1s, and yes, Skull Servants was what I had in mind when I made this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.