Dragon With Eyes Of Blue

[Luaín]

Dragon With Eyes Of Blue

LIGHT/Dragon/Link/Effect [bottom Left, Bottom Right]

ATK 2000 LINK 2

2 Dragon monsters

When this card is Link Summon; You can Special Summon 1 "Blue-Eyes" monster or 1 level 1 LIGHT tuner monster from your GY in defense position. Once per turn: You can send 1 dragon monster this card point to to your GY, and if you do, Special Summon 1 dragon monster from your GY, except the sent monster. If this card in its owner's possession leave the field because of an opponent's card effect; You can Special Summon 2 "Blue-Eyes" or 1 "Blue-Eyes" and 1 level 1 LIGHT tuner monster from your GY.

 

[spoiler= First version] Dragon With Eyes Of Blue

LIGHT/Dragon/Link/Effect [bottom Left, Bottom Right]

ATK 2300 LINK 2

2 Dragon monsters

When this card is Link Summon; You can Special Summon 1 "Blue-Eyes" monster or 1 level 1 LIGHT tuner monster from your GY in defense position. Once per turn: You can send 1 dragon monster this card point to to your GY, and if you do, Special Summon 1 dragon monster from your GY, except the sent monster. If this card in its owner's possession leave the field because of an opponent's card effect; You can Special Summon 2 "Blue-Eyes" or 1 "Blue-Eyes" and 1 level 1 LIGHT tuner monster from your GY, then immediately after this effect resolve you can Fusion, Synchro or Xyz Summon 1 monster from your Extra Deck using those monsters as material. You can only use each effect of "Dragon With Eyes Of Blue" once per turn.

 

So ... The idea of this card is to make Blue-Eyes able to special summon more than 2 monsters per turn. Also, as any other With Eyes Of Blue, you also support level 1 LIGHT tuners, about balancing ... Yeah, I've tried this thing sometimes ... but not sure if it's THAT op, so... opinions would help so much

[Darj]

You are missing the materials.

Regardless of that, this is a bit too strong, IMO. 2300 is already too high for a Link2, when the highest values are around 1900~2000. Then, the float effect is a bit too rewarding; I mean, it's pretty much a Synchro 9 or Rank8. I would prefer if it didn't perform the Extra Deck Summon right away.

[Luaín]

You are missing the materials.

Regardless of that, this is a bit too strong, IMO. 2300 is already too high for a Link2, when the highest values are around 1900~2000. Then, the float effect is a bit too rewarding; I mean, it's pretty much a Synchro 9 or Rank8. I would prefer if it didn't perform the Extra Deck Summon right away.

1-. Right, materials fixed.

2.- Strong... Get it, the atk Is combined ATK and DEF from Sage(DEF) and Protector(ATK)... So... Alright, I'm going to fix it.

3.- Yeah... This is the effect where i think i just make it OP... So alright. Fix.

Also... English is not my native language so... i do not know what "IMO" means...

[Dragulas]

Materials are not listed, just so you know. (was writting the post while you fixed it)

Too much ATK for a Link 2 monster IMO

Owner's possession states places outside of the field as well so there is a contradiction in the floating effect

The effects are cool and somehting appreciated in Blue eyes but they really dont need a link monster, they summon big dragons and have only 1 ED monster at the time in regular situations, out side of soul charge shenanigans. Floating effect does too much recovery (even for blue eyes standards), blue eyes need something in the controlling aspect if you want this to "add" a new aspect for them. Its not broken though, also great name for the card, something with that name should be printed (regardless of what it is or does)

[Darj]

1-. Right, materials fixed.

2.- Strong... Get it, the atk Is combined ATK and DEF from Sage(DEF) and Protector(ATK)... So... Alright, I'm going to fix it.

3.- Yeah... This is the effect where i think i just make it OP... So alright. Fix.

Also... English is not my native language so... i do not know what "IMO" means...

 

IMO stands for "In My Opinion".

[Luaín]

Materials are not listed, just so you know. (was writting the post while you fixed it)

Too much ATK for a Link 2 monster IMO

Owner's possession states places outside of the field as well so there is a contradiction in the floating effect

The effects are cool and somehting appreciated in Blue eyes but they really dont need a link monster, they summon big dragons and have only 1 ED monster at the time in regular situations, out side of soul charge shenanigans. Floating effect does too much recovery (even for blue eyes standards), blue eyes need something in the controlling aspect if you want this to "add" a new aspect for them. Its not broken though, also great name for the card, something with that name should be printed (regardless of what it is or does)

Materials fixed.

ATK also fixed

Ahm... Samurai Skull has the same floating effect, but state that it must be face-up, link monster cannot be face-down so... Okay but... Where's the contradiction?, the too much recovery is noted, I'll think about that. Thanks for the name opinion... Guess.

Also... English is not my native language 

[Dragulas]

Materials fixed.

ATK also fixed

Ahm... Samurai Skull has the same floating effect, but state that it must be face-up, link monster cannot be face-down so... Okay but... Where's the contradiction?, the too much recovery is noted, I'll think about that. Thanks for the name opinion... Guess.

Also... English is not my native language 

English isnt my native language either, but i ve been keeping an eye (not even playing) on this game long enough to learn a couple of things, this kind of forums help on the matter as well.

Replacing itself with 2 more monsters seems a bit pointless to a degree, i mean you will probably get the 2 materials you used in first place, the hieratic link requires the same materials, points in the same direction and can float (by your own doing) into a dragon as well, of course this is blue eyes support but it can be more oriented to what you originally wanted, an extra deck monster on the field. You could make it to float into a LIGHT Dragon monster instead of 2 materials something similar to spirit dragon, of course blue eyes itself is not an xyz oriented deck, or rather is not supposed to but can still summon an xyz without material to rank it up. Just an idea.

On the text part its "possession" whats contradicting the effect, as i said before the former refers to places outside of the field as well (hand, deck, etc), thats why there is no point on puting possession when it clearly states it has to leaves the field, replace it with control (that means it has to be on the field).