Benachu666 Posted November 22, 2017 Report Share Posted November 22, 2017 So had an interesting idea. What about duel type monsters, essentially monsters with two types. An example would be a hellhound, it could be a beast and fiend type. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Flyer - Sakura Posted November 22, 2017 Report Share Posted November 22, 2017 So had an interesting idea. What about dual type monsters, essentially monsters with two types. An example would be a hellhound, it could be a beast and fiend type. It would save having to put in an added Type condition clause in the effect, but that's about the only thing it'd accomplish. Then again, Beast-Warrior already incorporates Beast and Warrior inherently, so there's no point in having the card be both. Also a note that you technically need cards in your opening post to be discussed. (To be honest, adding the Type clause isn't much more work.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benachu666 Posted November 22, 2017 Author Report Share Posted November 22, 2017 I do apologies then. Won't happen again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Flyer - Sakura Posted November 22, 2017 Report Share Posted November 22, 2017 The rule is more/less so we can see how your new concept works. (Don't worry about it too much.) In this case, I suppose you don't need to illustrate it too since it's basically doing what a lot of new members already do for cards (and doesn't involve a new summon mechanic and all). Most you'd probably have to do is just make cards that interact with monsters that have 2 Types. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benachu666 Posted November 22, 2017 Author Report Share Posted November 22, 2017 Ah ok makes sense. So branching effects that play off the concept. That shouldn't be to hard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkaterTheDJWolf Posted November 26, 2017 Report Share Posted November 26, 2017 Then again, Beast-Warrior already incorporates Beast and Warrior inherently, so there's no point in having the card be both. No. Beast-Warrior is a separate Type from Warrior and Beast.Oh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Flyer - Sakura Posted November 26, 2017 Report Share Posted November 26, 2017 No. Beast-Warrior is a separate Type from Warrior and Beast.Oh Yeah, I know it's a separate type, but for some players who wanted to make a Beast-Warrior monster, you already have it instead of needing to make it a Beast and Warrior monster at the same time. Unless you don't want to give it access to Tenki or whatever generic support Beast-Warriors can look forward to having right now, or for some odd reason, give said monster access to Warrior support and Beast stuff at same time. Only real application for dual typing is basically access to multiple type specific cards, if you can find space for them in a modern deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.