Preface, I don't like Snatch. To be honest, I actually dislike him. Which is why it's all the important to stand up for his rights as well.
Snatch was reportedly banned on two charges: (1) His comments on the August Ames thread (2) him commenting and laughing at Enguin's joke.
The latter is problematic for the same reason Enguin's ban is wrong. The way the mods dealt with antisemitism in the past is wholly inconsistent with this new zero tolerance policy they've been pushing in the last week or so. I don't have a big problem with such a policy, but the onus is on the mod teams to make the rules abundantly clear before they start enforcing them.
The way Shard & Zai were treated vs the way Enguin & Snatch were treated shows this did NOT happen
In the Ames thread Snatch made, in my opinion, foul statements dismissing the death of Miss Ames because (1) I defended her (2) the group that was in opposition to her is one Snatch finds kinship with. I don't think anyone was more angry with Snatch's reply than me (as my response to him showed), but neither of these views are banworthy. He has a right to have an victim complex and lash out.
His posts were flawed factually, but they were not banworthy
Questions: Did Snatch already get a the first stage of ban recently? How many warning points did have before yesterday?
How many pts did he receive for each incident.