[Leaderboard] D'Sceptyr vs. Batmed (Challenger's Choice III) (Cards UP!)

[Black D'Sceptyr]

Rules:

All Leaderboard rules apply.

First to 3 votes or most votes by deadline wins.

All voters must elaborate on their votes or else the vote will be rejected.

Both contestants have the right to refuse votes but must explain why they don't accept it.

Card C votes are allowed in case the voter thinks both cards don't deserve a vote but must elaborate on why he/she thinks so.

Cards must be PM'd to me.

Written cards are allowed.

Winner gets 1 point from the loser; each voter gets 1 point from the person they voted for.

Remove any evidence of the card being made by you to ensure anonymity.

In case a downtime or an emergency happens, the deadlines may be extended.

 

Deadlines:

The deadline for cards is 48 hours after the challenge has been accepted.

The deadline for votes is 96 hours (4 days) after cards have been posted.

In case of a challenger failing to meet the above deadline without explanation, the challenger slot will open up again, at which point it becomes first-come-first-served between the previous challengers and new submissions.

 

Requirement:

 

Challenger's Choice!

 

Twilightsworn Time! 

 

 

[spoiler=Card A]

 

Spellcaster-Type Effect Monster/DARK/Level 4/300 ATK/2100 DEF

 

Lore: If you take 1000 or more damage from a battle involving a "Lightsworn" monster you control: You can banish 2 "Lightsworn" monsters from your hand or GY: make that monster unable to be destroyed by that battle, it becomes a Level 3 Tuner, also after that, Special Summon this card from your hand or GY. If this card is Normal or Special Summoned; You gain 1000 LP, also if there are 2+ Attributes among the "Lightsworn" monsters you control, you can Synchro or Link Summon 1 monster using "Lightsworn" monsters you control as materials. You can only use each effect of "Jenis, Twilightsworn Cleric" once per turn.

 

 

[spoiler=Card B]

Daimon, Twilightsworn Tyrant

 

Fiend-Type Effect Monster/DARK/Level 7/2400 ATK/0 DEF

 

Lore: If this card is in your hand or GY: You can send from your hand and/or field to the GY, 2 "Lightsworn" monsters with the same Type but different Attributes; Special Summon this card. If a "Lightsworn" monster(s) is banished: You can discard 1 card; Special Summon from your Deck or GY 1 “Lightsworn” monster with the same original Type and Level of 1 of those banished monsters, but with a different Attribute. If this card is sent to the GY because of an opponent's card effect or being destroyed by battle: You can target 1 of your banished cards; add it to your hand. You can only use each of the following effects of "Daimon, Twilightsworn Tyrant" once per turn.

 

[BatMed]

[spoiler=pick a boo](Twi)Lightsworn or Fabled card?

 

[Nathanael D. Striker]

Any reason why your post is hard to read? I'm on mobile, and it has a black background.

[Flash Flyer - Sakura]

Any reason why your post is hard to read? I'm on mobile, and it has a black background.

 

Could be some internal thing with the site, as I've seen other posts in the same fashion. All I had to do was just open quick edit and it went back to normal.

[Black D'Sceptyr]

Could be some internal thing with the site, as I've seen other posts in the same fashion. All I had to do was just open quick edit and it went back to normal.

 

I'll keep that in mind for future installments.

 

[spoiler=pick a boo](Twi)Lightsworn or Fabled card?

 

 

You're on, and I do think the Twilightsworn lineup, strictly, would make a good challenge.

 

Cardmaking process begins now.

[Black D'Sceptyr]

Cards are up and comments are welcome

 

WESTSIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIDE none of that

[BatMed]

bump

[Darj]

Dunno if it's too late to vote, but here it goes anyway.

 

I vote for Card A. Mostly for flavor, practically. Both can self-Summon themselves from the hand or GY, and each with their different conditions. However, Card B doesn't come from any LS counterpart AFAIK, and that deducts flavor points in my book. Plus I'm not too keen on giving LSs a beater when they already plenty of power with Judgment Dragon and Fairy Tail Snow, while Card A adds defense with its self-Summon effect and interesting plays with its Synchro/Link summoning quick effect, and the Tuner conversion. Not a big fan on the costs for the effects of Card A either, although, to be fair, he float helps to mitigate them.

 

Want to add that the card text of Card A is a bit messy, but at least the effects are understandable.

[BatMed]

Dunno if it's too late to vote, but here it goes anyway.

 

I vote for Card A. Mostly for flavor, practically. Both can self-Summon themselves from the hand or GY, and each with their different conditions. However, Card B doesn't come from any LS counterpart AFAIK, and that deducts flavor points in my book. Plus I'm not too keen on giving LSs a beater when they already plenty of power with Judgment Dragon and Fairy Tail Snow, while Card A adds defense with its self-Summon effect and interesting plays with its Synchro/Link summoning quick effect, and the Tuner conversion. Not a big fan on the costs for the effects of Card A either, although, to be fair, he float helps to mitigate them.

 

Want to add that the card text of Card A is a bit messy, but at least the effects are understandable.

Given to its name and stats, Card B is actually a counterpart of Curious. Also 2.4k might be a good stat but to consider it a beater? I don't know. Might wait for D'Sceptyr to approve this.

[Darj]

That doesn't help its case IMO. Curious is Warrior and this a Fiend, while Twilightsworns retained their Types. Also you are converting a Link into a maindeck monster, which has no precedence in Twilightsworns either. Also that's the sad part about it: I called it a beater because IMO that's it's main highlight, and yet 2400 isn't an impressive number. IDK,feels more like an overkill card for LSs, while Card A offers more strategic plays, making it more interesting IMO.

[BatMed]

That doesn't help its case IMO. Curious is Warrior and this a Fiend, while Twilightsworns retained their Types. Also you why tho XD are converting a Link into a maindeck monster, which has no precedence in Twilightsworns either. Also that's the sad part about it: I called it a beater because IMO that's it's main highlight, and yet 2400 isn't an impressive number. IDK,feels more like an overkill card for LSs, while Card A offers more strategic plays, making it more interesting IMO.

I see, and I approve. Still let us wait for Scepty to finish this!

[Flash Flyer - Sakura]

Uh, the deadline passed a while ago and BDS is nowhere to be seen. 

 

Since you're okay with the result @@BatMed, I'm just going to call it at this point as 1-0 card A. Just record it in the main post.