The funniest part about this thread is Justice Thomas, and all the "he had a right to be angry" bullshit.
Clinton was too emotionally unstable to serve as President but a grown man seething with rage and ranting incoherently about his love for beer is Justice where it's due.
Not to mention Thomas' weak ass likened his hearing to a fucking lynching. I hope the three of you have daughters.
In short words: Name one good reason that he shouldn't be angry.
A man, a father, and a judge, falsely accused, after an honest life, will rightfully be incensed when they are treated by their peers, as if they had been convicted, before any trial ever occurs. Add on top of that, the death threats to his daughters, and their decision to pray for the people who put them through hell, instead of holding a grudge. this man being moved to tears is the natural result of two weeks of absolute bullshit from the twilight zone.
His enjoyment of beer (something many grown adults in america can attest to) was literally used to attack him. telling him he can't fire back after attacking him on the topic is plain foolish. you gonna complain about him calling out trap questions? The where's your complaint about the question"Do you wish she had never come forward with these allegations" aka one of the most leading questions asked? Where's your rationale against him describing, in complete detail, the devils triangle drinking game, when they attempted to grill him on it? Where's your assessment of his easily confirmed explanation of FFFF being a verbal tick of his friend who swore a lot? Where's your criticism of ford's obviously false tears? Where's your logic when everybody that she herself named, denies the party that she alleges ever happening? Where's your complaint for her therapist note being vastly different than her senate testimony?
Many people in history have been publicly hanged for crimes they didn't commit (most popularly during the salem witch trials). This isn't a literal lynching, but the moniker of this being a social lynching fits perfectly. They've attacked his character with baseless allegations, and slandered him with more of the same when he responded with rage towards them. What's so weak about a man who made it through this before speaking out against it again?
Her testimony can specify neither when she was at said party, what house said party was at, who brought her home, why her best friend at this supposed gathering, never questioned why she left in such a strange manner, or why she was at a gathering of 4(sometimes 6) people. That's while neglecting the more modern lies, like the fear of flying, the continuous change in setting (One was during the school year, the other was during the summer), the safeway she claims to have encountered for at wasn't even open during the year(s) she claimed she met him there, the year itself has changed multiple times now, ect. Bring more than slander if you want to make a point. This is he say she say, and she hasn't said any thing credible to date. unless you heard something she said that actually proves the event happened?
I can punch holes in her story all day long, and the only thing you have here is emotion. You know better than that.