Ryusei the Morning Star Posted October 17, 2018 Report Share Posted October 17, 2018 https://dfw.cbslocal.com/2018/10/12/women-accused-paid-voter-fraud-ring/ “The harvesters sit around and fill these out by the hundreds, often by the thousands,” he said Friday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dad Posted October 17, 2018 Report Share Posted October 17, 2018 "Four" By the "thousands". But only 5 or so were found? Sounds like more people need to be captured. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryusei the Morning Star Posted October 18, 2018 Author Report Share Posted October 18, 2018 "Four" By the "thousands". But only 5 or so were found? Sounds like more people need to be captured.No, 4 women were behind it, they handled thousands of ballots Sorry should have been clear Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Proto Posted October 18, 2018 Report Share Posted October 18, 2018 okay so not only are none of these people actual democratic political figures. theyre literally just randos who wanted to rig it in favor of the dems, none of them are mentioned to be poll workers or anything of the sort yet this is supposed to be more proof that all democrats favor voter fraud to push your agenda?is every republican that commits a crime in the name of their political agenda immediately representative of all of them? this isn't at all the bulletproof example you've been wading for lad. btw, general again? really? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vla1ne Posted October 20, 2018 Report Share Posted October 20, 2018 Gotta agree with proto for this one winter. He's pretty much right. You want to pin this on democrats, you gotta hit with bigger things outside of the article. For example, look towards the effort put into the fraud ring. Some stronger questions are: How did they have the funds, resources, or time to get all these fake ballots done? starting the topic with just an article doesn't give enough out to ake the base of your argument solid. they are clearly guilty of attempting to rig the votes in democratic favor, there's no question there, but you can't just use that to say the top democrats are the ones responsible. Even if there's a possibility that they're involved from the shadows, you gotta establish the basics to frame up the accusation. There's currently nothing that traces them to the tops. So this would likely have been better left in general. It's a decent piece, but until you can actually use it in a bigger puzzle, there's no need to include the rest of the pictures. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.